Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Mapping Infant Immunity with Minimal Input: Integrative Single-Cell and Multiomic Profiling
Published on: April 3, 2026
The impact of inactive infants on clinic-based immunization rates
Stephanie L Phibbs1, Simon J Hambidge, John F Steiner
1University of Colorado Health Sciences Center: Division of General Internal Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045-0508, USA. stephanie.phibbs@uchsc.edu
Objective:
Clinic-based immunization rates are used to evaluate clinic performance and immunization interventions, but they typically exclude so-called inactive patients (ie, those who no longer receive care at the clinic). We assessed the effect of enhanced ascertainment of inactive patients on clinic-based immunization rates and on the conclusions of a randomized controlled trial.
Methods:
The study was a post hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Infant randomization to the immunization intervention (4 clinics) or control group (4 clinics) was based on the site of their 2-week well-child care visit. The study was conducted at an integrated inner-city health care system serving a low-income population. A total of 2190 infants born between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 1999, who attended at least 1 postnatal visit, participated. In control sites, clinic staff documented inactive infants in the immunization registry and medical charts. The research staff undertook additional patient tracking efforts in the intervention clinics.
Results:
Control clinics identified 155 (13.4%) of 1160 children as inactive within 1 year of birth, whereas 284 (27.6%) of 1030 intervention infants were documented as inactive (P < .001). In bivariate analyses from the randomized trial, immunization rates differed between intervention and control branches. In multivariate models, immunization rates were significantly higher in the intervention branch when inactive infants were removed (adjusted relative risk 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.89), but not when they were included (adjusted relative risk 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.21).
Conclusions:
Additional patient tracking efforts can dramatically influence inactive patient documentation and clinic-based immunization rates used for various purposes.
More Related Videos
05:31Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels
Published on: August 7, 2017
08:12Isolation of Leukocytes from Human Breast Milk for Use in an Antibody-dependent Cellular Phagocytosis Assay of HIV Targets
Published on: September 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Development of Immunocompetence
The initial cells that migrate from the fetal thymus settle within the skin and epithelial tissues lining the mouth, digestive tract, and in females, the uterus and vagina. These cells, including skin-based dendritic cells, serve as antigen-presenting cells, playing a key role in T cell activation.
Subsequent T...
Active versus Passive Immunity
Active Immunity
Active immunity refers to the resistance one develops...
Vaccinations
Immunodeficiency Diseases
There are three main causes of immunodeficiency disorders...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Immunological Memory
What is Immunological Memory?
Immunological memory is an integral function of the immune system that allows it to recognize and react more rapidly and effectively to pathogens previously encountered. This feature is...