Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026

Application and Methodology of the Non-destructive 19F Time-domain NMR Technique to Measure the Content in Fluorine-containing Drug Products
Published on: August 22, 2017
Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of ranitidine and bismuth derived from two compound preparations
Quan Zhou1, Zou-Rong Ruan, Hong Yuan
1Department of Clinical Pharmacology, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang Province, China. zhouquan142602@zju.edu.cn
Aim:
To evaluate the bioequivalence of ranitidine and bismuth derived from two compound preparations.
Methods:
The bioavailability was measured in 20 healthy male Chinese volunteers following a single oral dose (equivalent to 200 mg of ranitidine and 220 mg of bismuth) of the test or reference products in the fasting state. Then blood samples were collected for 24 h. Plasma concentrations of ranitidine and bismuth were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), respectively. The non-compartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. Log-transformed C(max), AUC( (0-t) ) and AUC( (0-infinity) ) were tested for bioequivalence using ANOVA and Schuirmann two-one sided t-test. T(max) was analyzed by Wilcoxon's test.
Results:
Various pharmacokinetic parameters of ranitidine derived from the two compound preparations, including C(max), AUC( (0-t)), AUC( (0-infinity)), T(max) and T((1/2)), were nearly consistent with previous observations. These parameters derived from test and reference drug were as follows: C(max) (0.67 +/- 0.21 vs 0.68 +/-0.22 mg/L), AUC( (0-t) ) (3.1 +/- 0.6 vs 3.0 +/- 0.7 mg/L per hour), AUC( (0-infinity) ) (3.3 +/- 0.6 vs 3.2 +/- 0.8 mg/L per hour), T(max) (2.3 +/- 0.9 vs 2.1 +/- 0.9 h) and T((1/2)) (2.8 +/- 0.3 vs 3.1 +/- 0.4 h). In addition, double-peak absorption profiles of ranitidine were found in some Chinese volunteers. For bismuth, those parameters derived from test and reference drug were as follows: C(max) (11.80 +/- 7.36 vs 11.40 +/- 6.55 microg/L), AUC( (0-t) ) (46.65 +/- 16.97 vs 47.03 +/- 21.49 microg/L per hour), T(max) (0.50 +/- 0.20 vs 0.50 +/- 0.20 h) and T((1/2)) (10.2 +/- 2.3 vs 13.0 +/- 6.9 h). Ninety percent of confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of C(max), AUC( (0-t) ) and AUC( (0-infinity) ) derived from both ranitidine and bismuth were found within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 80%-125%. No significant difference was found in T(max) derived from both ranitidine and bismuth.
Conclusion:
The two compound preparations are bioequivalent and may be prescribed interchangeably.
More Related Videos
08:59An Intestine/Liver Microphysiological System for Drug Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Assessment
Published on: December 3, 2020
08:28Microsurgical Skills of Establishing Permanent Jugular Vein Cannulation in Rats for Serial Blood Sampling of Orally Administered Drug
Published on: December 14, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence: Overview
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications