Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Blinding

Blinding

Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The Converging Crises of Extreme Heat and Homelessness.

JAMA internal medicine·2025

Same author

HPV Self-Collection for Cervical Cancer Screening-There's No Place Like Home.

JAMA internal medicine·2025

Same author

Joint Exposure to Ozone and Temperature and Acute Myocardial Infarction Among Adults Aged 18 to 64 Years in the United States.

Circulation·2025

Same author

Temporal Trends in Opioid Use and Associated Outcomes for Patients Living with Advanced Cancer.

Journal of pain and symptom management·2025

Same author

Concordance between clinical trial data use request proposals and corresponding publications: A cross-sectional study.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025

Same author

Salary Differences by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity Among Assistant Professors at US Medical Schools.

JAMA network open·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Does random treatment assignment cause harm to research participants?

Cary P Gross¹, Harlan M Krumholz, Gretchen Van Wye

¹Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. cary.gross@yale.edu

|May 25, 2006

Summary

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) do not harm participants. A systematic review found that patients in RCTs experienced similar health outcomes to those receiving individualized treatment outside of trials.

More Related Videos

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis

Published on: December 20, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Social Threat-Safety Test Uncovers Psychosocial Stress-Related Phenotypes

Published on: December 15, 2023

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis

Acupoint Catgut Embedding Therapy in Traditional Chinese Medicine for Managing Allergic Rhinitis

Published on: December 20, 2024

Area of Science:

Clinical Research
Medical Ethics
Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

Debate exists on whether randomized clinical trials (RCTs) offer substandard care by limiting individualized treatment.
Concerns persist regarding the impact of random treatment assignment on patient outcomes within RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

To systematically review and quantify differences in health outcomes between RCT participants and eligible non-participants.
To assess the impact of random treatment assignment on patient outcomes in clinical research.

Main Methods:

Systematic review of studies comparing clinical outcomes of RCT participants and eligible non-participants.
Inclusion criteria required documentation of baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and access to interventions for both groups.

Main Results:

No significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between randomized trial participants and eligible non-participants in 88% of eligible studies.
Random treatment assignment showed no relation to clinical outcome in 88% of studies where baseline health status was similar between groups.

Conclusions:

Randomized treatment assignment within clinical trials does not appear to negatively impact research participants' health outcomes.
Findings support the safety of participation in randomized clinical trials regarding treatment assignment.