Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Time as a guide to cause.

David A Lagnado1, Steven A Sloman

  • 1Department of Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. d.lagnado@ucl.ac.uk

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Causal information changes how we reason: a mixed-methods analysis of decision-making with causal information.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

A comparison of methods to elicit causal structure.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Less is more: Local focus in continuous time causal learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Radical Collective Intelligence and the Reimagining of Cognitive Science.

Topics in cognitive science·2024
Same author

Not so simple! Causal mechanisms increase preference for complex explanations.

Cognition·2023
Same author

Categorical Updating in a Bayesian Propensity Problem.

Cognitive science·2023
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

People infer causal structure using temporal order and intervention cues, which often override statistical data. These findings support a hypothesis-driven learning model where initial causal ideas are tested against observations.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Causal Inference
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Understanding how humans learn causal structure is fundamental to cognitive science.
  • Existing research highlights the role of statistical information (covariation) in causal learning.
  • The relative importance of temporal order and interventional cues remains an active area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay between temporal-order, intervention, and covariational cues in human causal structure learning.
  • To determine which cues people prioritize when inferring cause-and-effect relationships.
  • To test a hypothesis-driven account of causal learning.

Main Methods:

  • Two studies were conducted involving participants inferring causal relationships.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants were presented with information about temporal order, interventions, and covariation between variables.
  • Analyses focused on how different cue types influenced causal judgments.

    • Main Results:

    • Temporal order cues significantly influenced causal inferences, sometimes overriding accurate covariational information (Study 1).
    • Both temporal order and intervention cues jointly improved causal inference accuracy beyond covariational data alone (Study 2).
    • These findings indicate that temporal and interventional cues are dominant in causal structure learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Humans employ a hypothesis-driven approach to causal learning, generating initial causal models based on cues like temporal order.
    • These models are subsequently tested against incoming covariational data.
    • Temporal order and intervention cues play a critical role, often outweighing statistical evidence in inferring causality.