Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The intention superiority effect in motor skill learning.

Arnaud Badets1, Yannick Blandin, Cédric A Bouquet

  • 1Maison des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Societé.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gender in action: Stereotype effects in the action observation-verb processing link.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

The added value of point-light display observation combined to physical practice in learning a functional strength training movement for experienced athletes.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

SmartDetector: a valid and affordable AI-based markerless motion capture system for psychological experiments.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same author

Level-1-visual perspective taking for human and robot avatars.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Effect of spatial training on space-number mapping: a situated cognition account.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Regulation of automatic imitation: Domain-specific versus domain-general control processes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Intending to perform motor sequences enhances recognition but not performance, except for observational practice, which showed improved task engagement. This suggests intention influences motor learning differently across practice types.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Learning
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The intention to perform future actions is known to influence cognitive processing, similar to verbal scripts.
  • Prior research suggests intention superiority effects in memory and performance for verbal tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if intention to perform motor sequences elicits similar activation and inhibition patterns as verbal scripts.
  • To examine the impact of intention on motor sequence acquisition, retention, and performance under different practice conditions (physical vs. observational).

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted, manipulating intention to perform motor sequences.
  • Participants were informed or not informed about a future retention test.
  • Performance was assessed through acquisition, retention tests, and response latency, with Experiment 3 including observational practice.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A strong intention superiority effect was observed in recognition tests.
  • Intention instructions did not significantly affect motor sequence acquisition or retention performance.
  • Response latency was influenced by intention, and observational practice showed enhanced performance for intentional tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Intention influences the recognition of motor sequences but not necessarily their acquisition or retention.
  • Observational practice may be more susceptible to the performance-enhancing effects of intention compared to physical practice.
  • Findings suggest intention's role in motor learning is modulated by the nature of practice.