Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Testimony and interrogation of minors: assumptions about maturity and morality
Jessica Owen-Kostelnik1, N Dickon Reppucci, Jessica R Meyer
1Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22904, USA. jao5j@virginia.edu
Abstract:
This article examines the legal histories and social contexts of testimony and interrogation involving minors, developmental research on suggestibility and judgment, interactions between development and legal/sociological contexts, and the reasoning behind how minors are treated in different legal contexts. The authors argue (a) that young witnesses, victims, and suspects alike possess youthful characteristics that influence their ability to validly inform legal processes, some of which were recently recognized by the Supreme Court as they apply to the juvenile death penalty, and (b) that consideration should be given to reforming current practices in the context of juvenile interrogation. ((c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Related Concept Videos
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Piaget's Stage 4 of Cognitive Development
Abstract Reasoning and Hypothetical-Deductive Thinking
Unlike the concrete operational...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

