Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fetal growth compromise: definitions, standards, and classification.

Dev Maulik1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Winthrop University Hospital, 259 First Street, Mineola, New York 11501, USA. wirving@winthrop.org

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
|May 25, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Fetal growth compromise is identified using birth weight percentiles, but this doesn't distinguish constitutional smallness from growth failure. Standardized terminology for fetal growth restriction is recommended for accurate prenatal and birth weight assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Opinion: The diagnosis and management of suspected fetal growth restriction: an evidence-based approach.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2022
Same author

Quality criteria for randomized controlled studies: obstetrical journal guidelines.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2021
Same author

Metabolomic identification of placental alterations in fetal growth restriction.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2020
Same author

First-trimester metabolomic prediction of stillbirth.

The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians·2018
Same author

A brief history of fetal echocardiography and its impact on the management of congenital heart disease.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2017
Same author

Introduction: From fetal echocardiography to fetal cardiology: A journey of over half a century.

Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)·2017

Area of Science:

  • Perinatology
  • Neonatalogy
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Background:

  • Fetal growth compromise is typically defined by gestational age-specific thresholds, commonly the 10th percentile for birth weight or estimated fetal weight.
  • Current definitions struggle to differentiate between constitutional smallness and true fetal growth failure.
  • Common terms like fetal growth restriction (FGR) and small for gestational age (SGA) are used, but their application requires clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the definitions and terminology used for fetal growth compromise.
  • To discuss the limitations of current growth assessment methods and reference charts.
  • To evaluate the clinical relevance of classifying FGR into symmetric and asymmetric types.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and clinical guidelines on fetal growth assessment.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the impact of different growth reference charts (population-based vs. customized).
  • Discussion of the diagnostic criteria and implications of symmetric versus asymmetric FGR.

    • Main Results:

    • The 10th percentile threshold is insufficient to differentiate constitutional smallness from fetal growth failure.
    • Recommendations are made to reserve 'fetal growth restriction' and 'intrauterine growth restriction' for prenatal assessments and 'small for gestational age' for birth weight assessments.
    • While symmetric FGR is more common and associated with better outcomes than asymmetric FGR, this classification may lack clinical utility.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate and consistent terminology is crucial for understanding and managing fetal growth compromise.
    • Further research is needed to refine growth assessment methods and the clinical relevance of FGR classifications.
    • Standardized definitions will improve prenatal diagnosis, management, and research in fetal growth restriction.