Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP).
Published on: March 6, 2018
[Comparison of efficacy between procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids and open hemorrhoidectomy]
Chao-wen Chen1, Xue-bin Zhan, Li-jun Niu
1Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 100083, China. ccw0070890@sina.com
Insights
The Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) and open hemorrhoidectomy offer comparable relief for prolapse, bleeding, and pain. Both surgical options demonstrate similar safety and effectiveness for treating prolapsed hemorrhoids.
Area of Science:
- Colorectal surgery
- Surgical outcomes research
Background:
- Hemorrhoids and rectal prolapse are common conditions requiring surgical intervention.
- Traditional open hemorrhoidectomy is a widely used treatment.
- The Procedure for Prolapse and Hemorrhoids (PPH) is an alternative surgical technique.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of PPH and open hemorrhoidectomy.
- To evaluate symptom relief, complication rates, and recurrence between the two procedures.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study comparing PPH and open hemorrhoidectomy.
- Patient data collected via questionnaires and proctological examinations.
- Comparison of symptom relief, complications, and recurrence rates over a three-year period.
Main Results:
- Both PPH and open hemorrhoidectomy showed high rates of prolapse (92.7% vs 96.8%), bleeding (91% vs 81%), and pain relief (91.7% vs 91.5%).
- No significant differences were observed in overall complication rates (30.2% vs 29.5%) or recurrence rates (21.8% vs 20.5%).
- Patient satisfaction was high in both groups, with 87.5% for PPH and 84.8% for open hemorrhoidectomy.
Conclusions:
- PPH is a safe and effective surgical option for prolapsed hemorrhoids.
- Outcomes of PPH are comparable to open hemorrhoidectomy in terms of symptom relief, complications, and recurrence.
Objective:
To compare the results of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and open hemorrhoidectomy.
Methods:
A standard questionnaire was given to all patients after PPH or open hemorrhoidectomy from March 2001 to March 2004. In combination with proctological examination, the results including symptoms relief and recurrence were compared between the two groups.
Results:
There were 184 effective questionnaires, including 96 cases in PPH group and 88 in open hemorrhoidectomy group. PPH and open hemorrhoidectomy both relieved prolapse (92.7% vs 96.8%, P=0.282), bleeding (91% vs 81%, P=0.241) and pain (91.7% vs 91.5%, P=0.977). There were no statistical differences in the overall complication rate (30.2% and 29.5%, P=0.923) and recurrence rate (21.8% vs 20.5%, P=0.814) between the two groups. The overall satisfactory degree was 87.5% in PPH group and 84.8% in open hemorrhoidectomy group (P=0.218).
Conclusion:
PPH is a safe and effective option for prolapsed hemorrhoids compared with open hemorrhoidectomy.
More Related Videos
03:06Combination of High Ligation and Intraoperative Embolization Using Polidocanol for Treatment of Varicoceles
Published on: December 22, 2023
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures (IRCP): A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: