Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improvements in skin-testing technique.

Warner W Carr1

  • 1Department of Allergy and Immunology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. warnercarr@hotmail.com

Allergy and Asthma Proceedings
|May 27, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-world effects of asthma biologics on blood eosinophil levels: data from the CHRONICLE study.

The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma·2026
Same author

Biologic outcomes in patients with severe asthma and clinically relevant allergy in the CHRONICLE study.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global·2025
Same author

ADP101 multifood oral immunotherapy for food-allergic patients: Harmony phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial.

The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global·2025
Same author

Dupilumab as an Adjunct to Oral Immunotherapy in Pediatric Patients With Peanut Allergy.

Allergy·2024
Same author

Reduced Effectiveness of Anti-IgE Treatment Among Adults with Severe Asthma with Older Age of Asthma Onset: Results from the CHRONICLE Study.

Journal of asthma and allergy·2024
Same author

Immune response evolution in peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut-allergic children.

Allergy·2023
Same journal

Key factors in the diagnosis of sesame allergy in children.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2026
Same journal

Immunoglobulin E-mediated pumpkin seed allergy in children: Case series and narrative review with a structured literature search.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2026
Same journal

Predictors of delayed treatment-free remission with omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2026
Same journal

The digital front door: A national analysis of U.S. allergy and immunology fellowship program web sites.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2026
Same journal

The impact of dietary patterns on the risk of asthma in children.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2026
Same journal

The alpha-gal syndrome: Understanding the role of tick bites, and the delays in severe anaphylaxis.

Allergy and asthma proceedings·2026
See all related articles

Allergy skin testing accurately diagnoses allergic diseases. This review examines skin-prick testing devices, emphasizing their performance and safe use in pediatric patients.

Area of Science:

  • Allergy and Immunology
  • Dermatology

Background:

  • Allergy skin testing is crucial for diagnosing allergic diseases and guiding treatment.
  • Optimizing diagnostic accuracy while minimizing patient discomfort is a key goal for allergists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the diagnostic utility of intradermal versus skin-prick testing for aeroallergies.
  • To evaluate the performance characteristics of various skin-prick testing devices.
  • To discuss the safety of skin testing in pediatric populations.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review of existing medical literature on allergy skin testing techniques and devices.
  • Analysis of studies comparing intradermal and skin-prick testing for aeroallergy diagnosis.
  • Evaluation of device performance metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and variability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Intradermal testing lacks proven diagnostic value for aeroallergy.
  • Significant statistical differences exist among various skin-prick testing devices, though clinical relevance is uncertain.
  • Skin testing in infants under six months requires caution, particularly those with eczema or a family history of atopy.

Conclusions:

  • Practicing allergists should carefully select skin-prick testing devices based on practice needs and ensure proper technician training.
  • Continued education on optimal skin testing techniques is essential.
  • Safety considerations are paramount when performing skin tests on infants.