Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

09:08
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
Published on: May 14, 2020
Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membrane
L Morawietz1, R-A Classen, J H Schröder
1Institute für Pathologie, University Hospital Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Journal of Clinical Pathology
|May 30, 2006
Summary
This study defines four types of periprosthetic membranes to standardize evaluation in total joint arthroplasty revision surgery. The classification aids research into prosthetic device loosening, highlighting the significance of non-infectious, non-particle-induced causes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Histopathology
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Periprosthetic membranes are common in total joint arthroplasty revision surgery.
- Standardized evaluation criteria for these membranes are lacking.
- Understanding membrane types is crucial for diagnosing prosthetic device loosening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce clearly defined histopathological criteria for standardized evaluation of periprosthetic membranes.
- To classify periprosthetic membranes into distinct types based on histomorphological features.
- To assess the utility of this classification in understanding prosthetic device loosening.
Main Methods:
- Histomorphological analysis of 370 periprosthetic membranes from revision surgeries.
- Defined four types: wear particle-induced (Type I), infectious (Type II), combined (Type III), and indeterminate (Type IV).
- Correlated histopathological findings with microbiological diagnoses and assessed inter-observer reproducibility.
Main Results:
- Type I (wear particle-induced) was most frequent (54.3%), followed by Type II (infectious, 19.7%).
- Type IV (indeterminate) represented 15.4% of cases, indicating non-infectious, non-particle-induced loosening.
- High correlation (89.7%) between histopathological and microbiological diagnoses and sufficient inter-observer reproducibility (85%).
Conclusions:
- The proposed classification provides a standardized method for typing periprosthetic membranes.
- This classification can serve as a tool for further research into the pathogenesis of total joint replacement loosening.
- The study underscores the clinical significance of Type IV membranes in prosthetic device loosening.

