Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Obstetric litigation is asphyxiating our maternity services.

Gary D V Hankins1, Alastair H MacLennan, Michael E Speer

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. ghankins@utmb.edu

Obstetrics and Gynecology
|June 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary

US obstetric care is improving, yet litigation over adverse outcomes threatens the specialty. Reforms like evidence-based medicine and a fair health court system are proposed to address these challenges.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Veterans Affairs Clinical Resource Hub Improve Access to Mental Health Services for Rural Veterans.

Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association·2026
Same author

Testing the performance of polygenic scores for multiple traits to explain cerebral palsy in two independent cohorts.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

Veterans Affairs Clinical Resource Hubs and Rates of Mental Health Community Care Referrals.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Primary Care by Telehealth and Care Quality in the Veterans Health Administration.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Patient-Centered Prioritization of Health Care Processes for Multimorbidity.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Genetic diagnostic yield by MRI pattern in children with cerebral palsy: a population-based study.

EBioMedicine·2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Healthcare Policy

Background:

  • US obstetric care metrics, including maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirth rates, indicate unprecedented quality.
  • Despite high-quality care, the specialty faces significant threats from litigation concerning adverse outcomes.
  • Current litigation processes often provide minimal benefit to the injured parties involved.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the impact of litigation on the specialty of obstetrics in the United States.
  • To identify potential solutions for mitigating the negative effects of "bad outcome" litigation.
  • To propose improvements to the medical-legal system within obstetrics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current trends in obstetric care quality metrics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the impact of litigation on obstetric practice.
  • Exploration of proposed reforms for medical malpractice and healthcare dispute resolution.

    • Main Results:

    • Obstetric care quality is at its highest, yet litigation poses a substantial risk to the specialty.
    • The existing litigation system offers limited advantages to patients experiencing adverse outcomes.
    • Proposed solutions aim to enhance fairness and rationality in obstetric-related legal disputes.

    Conclusions:

    • Emphasis on evidence-based medicine is crucial for improving obstetric care and reducing litigation.
    • Implementing a robust qualification and review process for medical experts is recommended.
    • Adoption of a more rational and equitable health court system could alleviate pressures on the obstetric specialty.