Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Public knowledge and public trust.

Sarah Cunningham-Burley1

  • 1Public Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Sarah.C.Burley@ed.ac.uk

Community Genetics
|June 3, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A novel protocol for a "Citizen Panel" for diverse Public and Participant Involvement in the review and development of the process to access data in the UK Longitudinal Linkage Collaboration Trusted Research Environment.

International journal of population data science·2025
Same author

Living With and Beyond Cancer With Comorbid Conditions: Qualitative Insights to Understand Psychosocial Support Needs.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2024
Same author

Laboratory Practices, Potentiality, and Material Patienthood in Genomic Cancer Medicine.

Science, technology & human values·2024
Same author

Unsettling the treatment imperative? Chemotherapy decision-making in the wake of genomic techniques.

Sociology of health & illness·2023
Same author

Implementation of a novel ultrasound training programme for midwives in Malawi: A mixed methods evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.

Frontiers in health services·2023
Same author

Feasibility and ethics of using data from the Scottish newborn blood spot archive for research.

Communications medicine·2022
Same journal

Does offering prenatal screening influence pregnant women's attitudes regarding prenatal testing?

Community genetics·2008
Same journal

Costs and effects of prenatal screening methods for Down syndrome and neural tube defects.

Community genetics·2008
Same journal

Family physicians' beliefs about genetic contributions to racial/ethnic and gender differences in health and clinical decision-making.

Community genetics·2008
Same journal

Healthy choices through family history: a community approach to family history awareness.

Community genetics·2008
Same journal

Population estimates of extended family structure and size.

Community genetics·2008
Same journal

A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage.

Community genetics·2008
See all related articles

Public skepticism towards genomics research is not a problem but a resource. Engaging with public ambivalence can enhance ethical debates and drive scientific progress through greater involvement in policy and agenda-setting.

Area of Science:

  • Sociology of Science
  • Bioethics
  • Public Health Genomics

Background:

  • Genomic medicine is expanding from clinics to communities, necessitating public understanding and engagement.
  • Public perception of science has shifted from a deficit model to recognizing diverse public knowledge systems.
  • There's a growing concern about public trust in science, particularly in genomics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore public knowledge and trust in relation to genomic research.
  • To advance discussions on public involvement in genomics and the role of social sciences.
  • To reframe public skepticism and ambivalence not as barriers, but as valuable resources for dialogue and progress.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of public understanding of science and trust.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of empirical research on public attitudes towards genomics.
  • Discussion of sociological perspectives on public engagement with science and technology.

    • Main Results:

    • Public trust in genomics is complex, characterized by ambivalence, uncertainty, and risk, rather than a simple lack of confidence.
    • Skepticism and ambivalence are prevalent and deeply rooted in lived experiences.
    • These attitudes are often privatized and routinely managed by individuals.

    Conclusions:

    • Public skepticism and ambivalence in genomics should be mobilized to foster open debate and enhance scientific and ethical considerations.
    • Harnessing public knowledge and promoting reflexivity within scientific institutions are key to progress.
    • Greater public involvement in policy formation and agenda-setting is crucial for responsible genomics development.