Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Biological indicators for radiation damage.

W U Müller1, C Streffer

  • 1Institut für Medizinische Strahlenbiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany.

International Journal of Radiation Biology
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[A century of development in radiation biology. Basic principles of targeted and efficient radiotherapy].

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]·2012
Same author

Dual role of heat shock proteins (HSPs) in anti-tumor immunity.

Current molecular medicine·2012
Same author

Chromatin-bound PCNA as S-phase marker in mononuclear blood cells of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia or multiple myeloma.

Cell proliferation·2010
Same author

Toxicity of cadmium sulphate and methylmercuric chloride applied singly or in combination to early mouse embryos in vitro.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010
Same author

Scope of radiological protection control measures.

Annals of the ICRP·2008
Same author

Relative biological effectiveness of 6 MeV neutrons with respect to cell inactivation and disturbances of the G1 phase.

Radiation research·2008
Same journal

Adaptation of bacteria in mountains: investigation of the relationship with background radiation and mountain landscape.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Cellular effects induced by insoluble radioactive cesium-bearing microparticles derived from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Biochemical, structural and mutational landscapes of base excision repair enzymes and cancer: from atomic resolution to tumor signatures.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Cardiac substructure dose and the risk of arrhythmia after curative radiotherapy for thymic tumors.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Immunometabolic mechanisms of ionizing radiation in a mouse model of gastrointestinal acute radiation syndrome.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Tumor-associated macrophage-derived exosomes promote radio-resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells accompanied by suppression of the cGAS/STING pathway.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
See all related articles

Biological dosimetry uses multiple assays for accurate radiation dose estimation. Combining methods like chromosome analysis and electron spin resonance offers enhanced sensitivity and dose range for radiation damage assessment.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation biology
  • Biophysical sciences
  • Medical physics

Background:

  • Biological dosimetry is crucial for estimating radiation dose.
  • Chromosome analysis in lymphocytes is a primary method but has limitations.
  • Recent advancements offer new quantitative systems for biological dosimetry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review advancements in biological dosimetry methods.
  • To highlight the benefits of combining multiple assays for radiation dose estimation.
  • To discuss the specific advantages of various biological indicators.

Main Methods:

  • Chromosome aberration analysis in lymphocytes for low-LET radiation.
  • Electron spin resonance (ESR) technique for a broad dose range.
  • Hair diameter analysis for localizing partial-body exposure.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Blood cell frequency analysis for prognostic information.

    • Main Results:

    • Dicentrics in lymphocytes offer high sensitivity (0.05 Gy).
    • ESR covers a wide dose range (0.5-100 Gy).
    • Hair diameter and blood cell frequency provide localization and prognostic data.
    • Combined assays provide a comprehensive approach to radiation dosimetry.

    Conclusions:

    • Combining multiple biological dosimetry assays maximizes sensitivity and accuracy.
    • Each method has specific advantages for different exposure scenarios.
    • Integrated approaches are essential for effective radiation damage assessment and management.