Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benchmarking pK(a) prediction.

Matthew N Davies1, Christopher P Toseland, David S Moss

  • 1Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, Compton, Berkshire, RG20 7NN, UK. m.davies@mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk

BMC Biochemistry
|June 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ESR1 fusion proteins in breast cancer: distinguishing oncogenic drivers from passenger events.

Oncogene·2026
Same author

3D environment favors persistent changes in cell functions and altered morphology, wrinkling, and biomechanical signature of the nucleus.

Cell reports. Physical science·2026
Same author

Actin from within - how nuclear myosins and actin regulate nuclear architecture and mechanics.

Journal of cell science·2025
Same author

Extracting prime protein targets as possible drug candidates: machine learning evaluation.

Medical & biological engineering & computing·2023
Same author

Autophagy receptor NDP52 alters DNA conformation to modulate RNA polymerase II transcription.

Nature communications·2023
Same author

Myosin in chromosome organisation and gene expression.

Biochemical Society transactions·2023
Same journal

Application of WST-8 based colorimetric NAD(P)H detection for quantitative dehydrogenase assays.

BMC biochemistry·2019
Same journal

Association of TM6SF2 rs58542926 gene polymorphism with the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and colorectal adenoma in Chinese Han population.

BMC biochemistry·2019
Same journal

The active role of the transcription factor Sp1 in NFATc2-mediated gene regulation in pancreatic cancer.

BMC biochemistry·2019
Same journal

Role of the highly conserved G68 residue in the yeast phosphorelay protein Ypd1: implications for interactions between histidine phosphotransfer (HPt) and response regulator proteins.

BMC biochemistry·2019
Same journal

Up-regulation of DcR3 in microbial toxins-stimulated HUVECs involves NF-κB signalling.

BMC biochemistry·2018
Same journal

Soluble expression of recombinant midgut zymogen (native propeptide) proteases from the Aedes aegypti Mosquito Utilizing E. coli as a host.

BMC biochemistry·2018
See all related articles

Accurate prediction of protein pKa values is crucial for understanding protein function. PROPKA demonstrates superior accuracy compared to other methods, highlighting the importance of conformational sampling in predictive software.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Protein pKa values quantify ionizable group protonation, influencing protein interactions, folding, and activity.
  • Environmental factors and residue perturbations dictate pKa shifts from intrinsic values.
  • Three-dimensional structural data enables the calculation of these pKa shifts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To benchmark the performance of different protein pKa prediction techniques.
  • To analyze a large dataset of experimentally determined pKa values.
  • To identify a consensus approach for improved pKa prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large dataset of experimentally determined pKa values.
  • Benchmarking of four software implementations: MCCE, MEAD, PROPKA, and UHBD.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of combinatorial and regression analysis for consensus prediction.

    • Main Results:

    • PROPKA exhibited higher accuracy in pKa prediction compared to MCCE, MEAD, and UHBD.
    • Individual program performance variations are linked to their underlying methodologies.
    • A tendency for over- or underprediction was observed for specific programs.

    Conclusions:

    • PROPKA is the most accurate among the evaluated pKa prediction tools.
    • Comprehensive sampling of protein conformational states is essential for developing accurate predictive software.