Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.

James M Provenzale1, Robert J Stanley

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. prove001@mc.duke.edu

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
|June 6, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stark absorption spectroscopy of flavin mononucleotide and derivatives of pyrene, xanthene, phenoxazine, and thienotetracene.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

Retrospective Cohort Study: Five-Thread Guideline for Predicting Dental Implant Stability in Fresh Extraction Sites.

The Journal of oral implantology·2025
Same author

Time-resolved THz Stark spectroscopy of molecules in solution.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Severe CNS involvement in a subset of long-term treated children with infantile-onset Pompe disease.

Molecular genetics and metabolism·2024
Same author

The Discussion section: An important means to convince reviewers and editors of the worth of a scientific manuscript.

Clinical imaging·2023
Same author

Screening for Novel Fluorescent Nucleobase Analogues Using Computational and Experimental Methods: 2-Amino-6-chloro-8-vinylpurine (2A6Cl8VP) as a Case Study.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2023

This guide offers a structured approach to manuscript reviewing, aiming to enhance review quality for the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR). It serves as a checklist for reviewers and a preparation guide for authors.

Area of Science:

  • Medical publishing
  • Peer review process
  • Scientific communication

Background:

  • Manuscript review is crucial for scientific integrity.
  • Improving the quality of peer reviews benefits scientific journals.
  • Authors can benefit from understanding reviewer expectations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive, step-by-step guide for manuscript reviewers.
  • To enhance the overall quality of reviews submitted to the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR).
  • To offer a structured template for manuscript evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Development of detailed guidelines for manuscript review.
  • Creation of a checklist template for reviewers.
  • Incorporation of author-centric advice for manuscript preparation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A structured review process is outlined.
  • A template checklist is provided for consistent evaluation.
  • Guidelines address key aspects for authors to consider.

Conclusions:

  • The guidelines facilitate high-quality manuscript reviews.
  • The provided template serves as a practical reviewer checklist.
  • The principles assist authors in preparing manuscripts effectively.