Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Inverse plan optimization accounting for random geometric uncertainties with a multiple instance geometry

D L McShan1, M L Kessler, K Vineberg

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0010, USA. dlmcshan@umich.edu

Medical Physics
|June 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment data and technical process challenges for practical big data efforts in radiation oncology.

Medical physics·2018
Same author

Impact of complexity and computer control on errors in radiation therapy.

Annals of the ICRP·2012
Same author

Sensitivity analysis for lexicographic ordering in radiation therapy treatment planning.

Medical physics·2012
Same author

Treatment plan adaptation for MRI-guided radiotherapy using solely MRI data: a CT-based simulation study.

Physics in medicine and biology·2010
Same author

Comment on "Dosimetric evaluations of the interplay effect in respiratory-gated intensity-modulated radiation therapy" [Med. Phys. 36, 893-903 (2009)].

Medical physics·2009
Same author

A stochastic approach to estimate the uncertainty involved in B-spline image registration.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2009
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

The Multiple Instance Geometry Approximation (MIGA) method improves radiotherapy planning by simulating anatomical variations during optimization. This robust approach minimizes plan degradation from setup errors and motion, enhancing treatment accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Imaging

Background:

  • Highly conformal radiotherapy plans, especially Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT), are susceptible to degradation from patient setup errors and intratreatment motion.
  • Geometric uncertainties can compromise the accuracy and effectiveness of radiotherapy treatments, necessitating robust planning strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the Multiple Instance Geometry Approximation (MIGA) method for inverse planning to mitigate the impact of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy.
  • To demonstrate the efficacy of MIGA in optimizing treatment plans that are robust against setup errors and intrafraction motion.

Main Methods:

  • MIGA optimizes a single beam arrangement concurrently for multiple instances of patient anatomy, representing setup and motion uncertainties.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The method employs beamlet dose calculations for each anatomical instance, combining results via a weighted sum for composite dose optimization.
  • Beamlet intensities are optimized based on the cost function for the composite dose distribution, simulating random setup errors and intratreatment motion.

    • Main Results:

    • IMRT plans optimized with MIGA exhibit significantly reduced degradation when subjected to geometrical errors and are robust to simulated motions.
    • Complex head and neck plans with multiple targets and organs at risk showed marked improvement using the MIGA inverse planning method.
    • MIGA offers advantages over traditional planning target volume (PTV) expansions by accounting for correlated anatomical motions and differing geometry situations.

    Conclusions:

    • The MIGA method provides a robust approach to inverse planning, effectively addressing geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy.
    • MIGA-optimized plans demonstrate improved accuracy and robustness compared to conventional methods, particularly for complex treatment scenarios.
    • This technique can significantly correct for plan degradation caused by setup uncertainties, leading to more reliable patient treatments.