Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience.

Robert P Caruso1, Courtney K Phillips, Eric Kau

  • 1Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, 150 East 32nd Street, New York, NY 10016, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|June 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

International Delphi consensus on single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: patient selection, surgical technique, and training.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Single Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity-matched Comparison of Transvesical Versus Extraperitoneal Approaches from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium.

European urology oncology·2026
Same author

Autologous Tissue Substitutes for Ureteral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Outcomes.

European urology open science·2026
Same author

Pain Perception During Transperineal and Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Under Local An-esthesia: a Prospective Analysis of a Multi-ethnic and Diverse Cohort.

International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology·2026
Same author

PD36-04 The Influence of Regionalized Insufflation With Single Port Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy on Intraoperative Oxygenation and Ventilation: A Multi-Institutional Comparison Study With Multi-Port Transperitoneal Approach: Erratum.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Single-port Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy via Low Anterior Access: A Propensity-matched Comparative Analysis to Standard Transperitoneal Multiport Robotic Surgery from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC).

European urology focus·2025
Same journal

On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

The Journal of urology·2026
Same journal

Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

The Journal of urology·2026
See all related articles

Robotic assisted partial nephrectomy is safe for small kidney tumors. However, this robotic approach offers no significant clinical advantage over standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically demanding.
  • Robotic assistance may enhance surgical efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
  • To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of robotic assisted partial nephrectomy.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of 10 patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and 10 patients undergoing standard laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
  • Analysis of demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data.

Main Results:

  • No significant demographic differences between the two groups.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Similar intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
  • Two intraoperative complications in the robotic group; one conversion in the laparoscopic group.

    • Conclusions:

    • Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is safe and feasible for small exophytic renal masses.
    • The robotic approach does not provide a clinical advantage over conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.