Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records01:18

Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records

Maintaining nurses' educational and administrative records in healthcare settings, including hospitals and nursing schools, is paramount. Here's a breakdown of the types of academic records mentioned:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The surgery that thinks.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

Who decides what counts as illness?

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

General practice: medicine's living philosophy.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

A Communications Campaign to Build Confidence in Covid-19 Vaccines: The Boston Medical Center Experience.

NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery·2024
Same author

Can General Practitioners' personal knowledge base be justified?

MedEdPublish (2016)·2023
Same author

Addressing Inequities in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Uptake: The Boston Medical Center Health System Experience.

Annals of internal medicine·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

AMEE Education Guide no. 29: evaluating educational programmes.

John Goldie1

  • 1Department of General Practice and PrimaryCare, Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK. johngoldie@fsmail.net

Medical Teacher
|June 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary

This guide explores the evolution of program evaluation as an applied science. It offers a practical framework for evaluators, covering essential aspects from design to influencing decision-making in complex systems.

More Related Videos

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Applied Science
  • Program Evaluation

Background:

  • Program evaluation has evolved significantly over the past 40 years.
  • Initial focus on methodology has expanded to include contextual factors and political influences.
  • Decentralized and politicized systems present challenges for evaluation implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a historical review of program evaluation's development.
  • To offer a comprehensive framework for individuals undertaking evaluation.
  • To guide evaluators through the complexities of modern evaluation practice.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of program evaluation literature and practice.
  • Development of a practical framework for evaluators.
  • Discussion of key components of the evaluation process.

Main Results:

  • Evaluation practice has shifted from a purely methodological focus to encompass context and political realities.
  • A structured framework is presented to assist evaluators in navigating diverse evaluation scenarios.
  • Key considerations for effective evaluation, including ethics, design, and dissemination, are highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Program evaluation is a dynamic applied science requiring adaptability.
  • Effective evaluation necessitates understanding and navigating complex socio-political contexts.
  • This guide equips evaluators with the knowledge to conduct impactful evaluations and influence decision-making.