Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Risk-compensation behavior in children: myth or reality?
I Barry Pless1, Helen Magdalinos, Brent Hagel
1Departments of Pediatrics and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. barry.pless@mcgill.ca
This study found no evidence that children take more risks or experience more severe injuries when using protective equipment (PE). Risk homeostasis theory does not appear to apply to children aged 8-18 using PE.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric injury prevention research.
- Behavioral psychology and risk assessment.
Background:
- Risk homeostasis theory suggests individuals adjust their behavior to maintain a consistent level of risk.
- Protective equipment (PE) is intended to reduce injury risk, but its effectiveness may be influenced by behavioral changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the applicability of risk compensation and risk homeostasis theory in children.
- To determine if children using protective equipment exhibit different risk-taking behaviors or injury severity compared to non-users.
Main Methods:
- A case-control study involving 394 children (aged 8-18) who sustained injuries.
- Comparison of self-reported risk-taking behaviors between protective equipment (PE) users and non-users.
- Analysis adjusted for age, sex, personality, and activity type.
Main Results:
- No association was found between risk-taking behaviors and PE use.
- No relationship was observed between injury severity and PE use.
- The study included 235 PE users and 159 non-users from a total of 674 injured children.
Conclusions:
- The findings do not support risk homeostasis theory in children using protective equipment.
- The validity of risk homeostasis theory is questionable for children within the studied age range (8-18 years).
Related Concept Videos
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Conduct Disorder

