Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
Method to Obtain Pattern of Breathing in Senescent Mice through Unrestrained Barometric Plethysmography
Published on: April 28, 2020
Reduced breathing variability as a predictor of unsuccessful patient separation from mechanical ventilation
Marc Wysocki1, Christophe Cracco, Antonio Teixeira
1UPRES EA 2397, Université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Objectives:
To compare descriptors of the breath-to-breath respiratory variability during a 60-min spontaneous breathing trial in patients successfully and unsuccessfully separated from the ventilator and the endotracheal tube and to assess the usefulness of these predictors in discriminating these two categories of patients.
Design:
Prospective observational study.
Setting:
Four general intensive care units in university hospitals.
Patients:
A total of 51 consecutive patients mechanically ventilated for >24 hrs.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
Tidal volume, respiratory period, inspiratory time, expiratory time, mean inspiratory flow (tidal volume/inspiratory time), and duty cycle (inspiratory time/respiratory period) were obtained from the flow signal. Breath-by-breath variability was expressed in terms of their coefficients of variation (CV), the number of breaths among which a significant correlation was found (lag), and the autocorrelation coefficient between one breath and the following one. Five patients were excluded because of nonstationarity of the data, leaving 46 cases for analysis. Between-group comparison was conducted with the Mann-Whitney test, and a nonparametric classification and regression tree was used to identify variables discriminating "success" (n = 32) and "failure" patients (n = 14). All coefficients of variation were significantly higher in success patients, who also exhibited significantly less respiratory autocorrelation (shorter "short memory"). The classification and regression tree analysis allocated all success patients to a group defined by a coefficient of variation of tidal volume/inspiratory time of > or =19% and a coefficient of variation of inspiratory time/respiratory period of > or =10% that did not contain any failure patient. All failure patients belonged to a group with coefficient of variation of tidal volume/inspiratory time of <19%, a lag tidal volume of > or =11, and that contained no success patient.
Conclusions:
In intensive care unit patients undergoing a spontaneous breathing trial, breathing variability is greater in patients successfully separated from the ventilator and the endotracheal tube. Variability indices are sufficient to separate success from failure cases.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:29Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:23Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
01:26Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)