Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Shoulder arthroplasty].

Per G Jørgensen1, Anne Katrine Belling Sørensen, Gunnar Schwarz Lausten

  • 1Amtssygehuset i Herlev, Ortopaedkirurgisk Afdeling, Herlev.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|June 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Shoulder arthroplasty, often for proximal humerus fractures, is common in Denmark. While providing pain relief, these procedures typically result in permanent limitations in shoulder movement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unexpected positive cultures after revision shoulder arthroplasty: does it affect outcome?

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery·2021
Same author

[Giant cell tumor of the bone].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2017
Same author

The Danish Sarcoma Database.

Clinical epidemiology·2016
Same author

[Danish Sarcoma Database].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2012
Same author

[Malignant tumours of the hand].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2011
Same author

[Elbow arthroplasty].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2006

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Approximately 500 shoulder arthroplasties are performed annually in Denmark.
  • Two-thirds of these procedures address proximal humerus fractures.
  • Other primary indications include rheumatoid arthritis and various forms of arthrosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of shoulder arthroplasty procedures in Denmark.
  • To discuss common indications, surgical techniques, and expected outcomes.
  • To highlight the trade-offs between pain relief and functional restoration.

Main Methods:

  • Review of surgical indications for shoulder arthroplasty.
  • Description of prosthesis fixation techniques (with or without bone cement).
  • Discussion of specialized prostheses like inverse total arthroplasty and resurfacing prostheses.

Main Results:

  • Shoulder arthroplasty effectively manages pain for patients with fractures, arthritis, or arthrosis.
  • Prosthetic fixation can be achieved with or without bone cement.
  • Inverse and resurfacing arthroplasties offer solutions for specific patient profiles (e.g., rotator cuff deficiency, good bone stock).

Conclusions:

  • Shoulder arthroplasty is a significant orthopedic intervention in Denmark, primarily for fracture management.
  • While pain relief is a major benefit, patients should anticipate permanent restrictions in shoulder mobility.
  • Surgical options are tailored to patient-specific conditions, including bone quality and rotator cuff integrity.

Related Experiment Videos