Clinical and histologic results related to a low-modulus composite total hip replacement stem

Osteolysis secondary to stress shielding in patients with a total hip arthroplasty has been attributed to greater stiffness of the prosthetic femoral stem compared with the stiffness of the femur. This concern led to the development of a composite femoral stem implant with a structural stiffness similar to that of the native femur. The stem consists of a cobalt-chromium-alloy core surrounded by polyaryletherketone and titanium mesh for bone ingrowth. The purpose of this study was to determine the intermediate-term clinical, radiographic, and histologic results of the use of this stem.

Twenty-eight patients (nineteen men and nine women) with an average age of 51.3 years underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with the Epoch stem and were followed for an average of 6.2 years. Harris hip scores were determined and radiographic studies were performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at two-year intervals thereafter. In addition, dual x-ray absorptiometry scans were made up to two years postoperatively to evaluate osseous resorption. Two femora obtained at autopsy thirteen and forty-eight months after surgery were analyzed for bone ingrowth and ongrowth.

The Harris hip scores averaged 56 points preoperatively and improved to 97 points at the time of the last follow-up. Dual x-ray absorptiometry scans demonstrated the greatest decrease in mean bone density (27.5%) in Gruen zone 7 at two years. Radiographs demonstrated no instances of migration, and only one hip had osteolysis. All stems had stable osseous fixation. Histologic evaluation of the two femora that had been retrieved at autopsy at thirteen and forty-eight months showed the mean bone ingrowth (and standard deviation) along the entire length of the stem to be 49.62% +/- 13.04% and 73.57% +/- 8.48%, respectively, and the mean bone ongrowth to be 54.18% +/- 7.68% and 80.92% +/- 6.06%, respectively.

Intermediate-term follow-up of hips treated with the Epoch stem indicated excellent clinical success, radiographic evidence of osseous integration, and histologic findings of osseous ingrowth and ongrowth. Although the implant has been associated with excellent results in both the short and the intermediate term, longer follow-up will be necessary to assess the long-term function of the implant.