Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioethics as ideology: conditional and unconditional values.

Tom Koch1

  • 1Department of Geography, Medical, University of British Columbia, 1984 West Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2Z1, Canada. tomkoch@shaw.ca

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|June 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MAiD: How Slippery is its Slope?

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2025
Same author

Segmental and overall lumbar lordosis after single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2025
Same author

Disease mapping and innovation: A history from wood-block prints to Web 3.0.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

Back to the future: Covid-19 and the recurring debate over social determinants of disease, and health.

Social sciences & humanities open·2022
Same author

A Sceptics Report: Canada's Five Years Experience with Medical Termination (MAiD).

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2022
Same author

The practitioner as endangered citizen: a genealogy.

Monash bioethics review·2021

Bioethical discourse is often narrow due to its underlying ideology. This critique examines the arbitrary axioms of bioethics, proposing broader fundamental debates and new approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Political Philosophy

Background:

  • Bioethical discourse appears broad but is often confined to limited, non-fundamental parameters.
  • Divergent perspectives are not easily accommodated within current bioethical discussions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the ideology underpinning bioethics' fundamental axioms.
  • To analyze the political and economic perspectives promoted by bioethical ideology.
  • To propose new avenues for broader fundamental debates in bioethics.

Main Methods:

  • Ideological critique of bioethics' core principles.
  • Analysis of the political and economic influences on bioethical thinking.
  • Examination of the exclusivity of current bioethical axioms.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional EthicsPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Bioethics' fundamental axioms are identified as arbitrary and exclusive, not necessary and inclusive.
  • The ideological and political underpinnings of bioethical thought are unpacked.
  • Current bioethical debate is shown to be narrow and limited in scope.

Conclusions:

  • Bioethical debate requires a fundamental shift to accommodate divergent perspectives.
  • Challenging the arbitrary axioms of bioethics can lead to more inclusive and fundamental discussions.
  • New approaches are needed to broaden the scope and inclusivity of bioethical discourse.