Standardizing the comparison of systolic blood pressure vs. pulse pressure for predicting coronary heart disease
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Karina W Davidson1, Donald C Haas, Daichi Shimbo
1College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. kd2124@columbia.edu
Insights
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a stronger predictor of coronary heart disease than pulse pressure (PP). This finding is based on a long-term analysis of NHANES I participants, offering crucial insights for cardiovascular risk assessment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Public Health
Background:
- The relative predictive power of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse pressure (PP) for coronary heart disease (CHD) remains a subject of ongoing scientific debate.
- Understanding which blood pressure parameter is a superior indicator of cardiovascular risk is crucial for effective prevention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive value of SBP versus PP for incident coronary heart disease events.
- To determine whether SBP or PP is a stronger independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 6032 participants from the first National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES I).
- Longitudinal follow-up for an average of 16 years to ascertain coronary heart disease outcomes from hospital and mortality records.
- Multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses were employed to estimate relative risks (RR).
Main Results:
- Both SBP and PP were identified as significant predictors of coronary heart disease.
- When measured as an increase of 10 mm Hg, PP showed a greater relative risk (RR) than SBP.
- However, when measured as a 1 standard deviation (SD) increase, SBP demonstrated a larger RR compared to PP.
Conclusions:
- Systolic blood pressure (SBP) exhibits a greater relative risk for coronary heart disease events compared to pulse pressure (PP).
- While both SBP and PP are valuable predictors, SBP appears to be the more dominant factor in assessing long-term cardiovascular risk.
Abstract:
Whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) or pulse pressure (PP) is more predictive of coronary heart disease remains controversial. The authors analyzed 6032 participants in the first National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES I) followed up for an average of 16 years. Blood pressure was measured at baseline and coronary heart disease outcomes were determined from hospital or mortality records. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to estimate the multivariate-adjusted relative risk (RR) for increases of 10 mm Hg or 1 SD in SBP and PP, and the RR associated with PP was greater than the RR associated with SBP when using an increase of 10 mm Hg. However, when using an increase of 1 SD, the RR associated with SBP was larger than for PP. Although both are predictors, the authors conclude that SBP has a larger RR than PP for coronary heart disease events.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure
The average BP in an adult is typically around 120/80 mmHg (millimeters of mercury). In this measurement, the numerator (120) indicates the systolic pressure, which is the pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart's ventricles as blood is expelled. The denominator (80) represents the diastolic...
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
