Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outcomes research: a methodologic review.

Pierre I Karakiewicz1, Alberto Briganti, Felix K-H Chun

  • 1Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal, Canada. pierre.karakiewicz@umontreal.ca

European Urology
|June 10, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Obesity is associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A multi-institutional extended validation study.

Urologic oncology·2017
Same author

An Explanatory Case on the Limitations of Lymph Node Staging in Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Urology case reports·2017
Same author

Diagnostic Accuracy of <sup>64</sup>Copper Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: Our Preliminary Experience.

Urology·2017
Same author

The Microbiome of the Prostate Tumor Microenvironment.

European urology·2017
Same author

Is transurethral resection alone enough for the diagnosis of histological variants? A single-center study.

Urologic oncology·2017
Same author

Prognostic Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Primary Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Clinical genitourinary cancer·2017
Same journal

Re: McKay RR, Pal S, Xie W, et al. Advanced Urologic Cancer Consensus Conference (AUC3) 2025: Expert Consensus on the Management of Renal Cell and Urinary Tract Cancers. CA Cancer J Clin 2026;76:e70052.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Ultra-hypofractionated Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: 5-year Outcomes from a Pooled Analysis of the FASTRACK Trials.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Alexander D. Sherry, Van To, Criselle D'souza, et al. Metastasis-directed Therapy With or Without Pembrolizumab for Oligometastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Single-arm Phase 2 Trials. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.03.024.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Hormone Therapy Use and Duration with Postoperative Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer: an Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Re: Nguyen DD, Tadayon Najafabadi B, Lin L, et al. Effect of Prostate Cancer Screening with Prostate-specific Antigen Testing on Long-term Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eur Urol. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.04.005.

European urology·2026
Same journal

Histological Subtypes and Divergent Differentiation of Urothelial Carcinoma: Histology, Genomics, and Management Implications.

European urology·2026
See all related articles

Outcomes research has expanded significantly, categorized into macro, meso, and micro levels. Technological advancements and data sharing fuel its continued growth in healthcare.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Informatics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Outcomes research has evolved significantly over recent decades.
  • Understanding its conceptual trends is crucial for advancing healthcare.
  • The field integrates various methodologies to assess health outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the historical development of outcomes research.
  • To delineate the conceptual trends and structure of outcomes research.
  • To provide a framework for understanding the multifaceted nature of outcomes research.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and historical review of outcomes research literature.
  • Stratification of the field into distinct conceptual levels (macro, meso, micro).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of the scope and focus of research at each identified level.

    • Main Results:

    • Outcomes research is structured across macro, meso, and micro levels.
    • Macro-level research focuses on population health determinants, cost, and utilization.
    • Meso-level research examines effectiveness and program evaluation, while micro-level research addresses patient-clinician decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • The field of outcomes research has experienced exponential growth.
    • Key drivers for this expansion include information technology, data sharing, and collaborative research efforts.
    • Continued advancements in these areas will likely sustain future growth in outcomes research.