On the relationship between charge distribution, surface hydration, and the structure of the interface of metal...

The double layer structure of metal (hydr)oxides is discussed. Charge separation may exist between the minimum distance of approach of electrolyte ions and the DDL domain. The corresponding capacitance value of the outer Stern layer is similar to the capacitance value of the inner Stern layer. The extended Stern model implicitly supports a hydration structure at the near-surface with some discrete layering of water and electrolyte ions. The significance of dipole orientation is analyzed theoretically. Dipole theory in combination with a calculated ion charge distribution is compared with the experimental overall charge distribution. Ion charge distribution for various oxyanions has been calculated applying the Brown bond valence concept to the geometry of surface complexes that have been optimized with MO/DFT calculations. The comparison is done in detail for silicic acid adsorption on goethite. In addition, results are discussed for arsenite, carbonate, sulfate, and phosphate, using the same approach. The dipole correction depends on the charge introduced in a neutral surface by ion adsorption, which differs for the various ions studied. The fractional correction factor phi derived for the experimental data agrees with the theoretical value phi(m)=0.17+/-0.02. On an absolute scale, the dipole corrections are usually limited to the range about 0-0.15 v.u. The CD values calculated with MO/DFT are not particularly sensitive (approximately 0.03 v.u.) to the precise Fe-octahedral geometry, which suggests that a calculated CD is a reasonable approximation in ion adsorption modeling for ill-defined Fe-oxides like HFO and natural Fe oxide materials of soils.