Flexible intramedullary nailing versus external fixation of paediatric femoral fractures

Khurram Barlas1, Humayun Beg

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, United Kingdom. khurrambarlas@btinternet.com

Insights

Flexible intramedullary nailing offers better outcomes for pediatric femoral shaft fractures compared to external fixation. This surgical technique leads to faster recovery and fewer complications in children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Traumatology

Background:

  • Femoral diaphyseal fractures are common in children.
  • Surgical interventions like external fixation and flexible intramedullary nailing are used for treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare treatment outcomes of external fixation versus flexible intramedullary nailing in pediatric femoral diaphyseal fractures.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 40 children (5.4-14.1 years) with femoral diaphyseal fractures.
  • Two groups: 20 treated with external fixation, 20 with flexible intramedullary nailing.
  • Outcomes assessed included operative time, time to full weight bearing, range of motion, return to school, and complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Flexible intramedullary nailing had a shorter average operative time (70 min vs. 52 min).
  • Patients treated with flexible nails achieved full weight bearing, full range of motion, and returned to school sooner.
  • The external fixator group had a higher complication rate, including pain, leg-length discrepancy, and malalignment.

Conclusions:

  • Flexible intramedullary nailing is recommended for pediatric femoral shaft fractures requiring surgery.
  • External fixation should be reserved for open or severely comminuted fractures.