Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic versus open colostomy reversal: a comparative analysis.

Michael J Rosen1, William S Cobb, Kent W Kercher

  • 1Carolinas Laparoscopic and Advanced Surgery Program, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232, USA.

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery : Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract
|June 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coated Polypropylene Mesh Is Not an Independent Predictor of Wound Morbidity in Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

Subcutaneous Wound Management in Complex, Contaminated Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (AWR) - The "French Fry" Technique.

The American surgeon·2026
Same author

What Defines a Hernia Center of Excellence?

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

The Importance of Plastic Surgery in Multidisciplinary Teams: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Large Language Models in Surgery: Promise, Pitfalls, and Practical Use.

Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS·2026
Same author

Enterotomy Outcomes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

The Journal of surgical research·2026

Laparoscopic colostomy reversal offers a safer alternative to open surgery, significantly reducing complications and hospital stays. This minimally invasive technique leads to faster recovery and fewer wound infections, making it a preferred option for restoring intestinal continuity.

Area of Science:

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Open colostomy reversal is associated with high rates of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and incisional hernia.
  • These complications often limit patient acceptance and increase perioperative morbidity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic colostomy reversal compared to the traditional open approach.
  • To assess perioperative outcomes, including morbidity and recovery time, for both surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective comparison of 22 laparoscopic colostomy reversals with 22 randomly selected open colostomy reversals.
  • Patients were analyzed for demographics, indications for colostomy, and perioperative outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic reversal showed significantly less estimated blood loss (113 vs. 270 ml, P=0.01) and fewer perioperative complications (14% vs. 59%, P=0.01).
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic reversal experienced earlier passage of flatus (3.5 vs. 5.0 days, P=0.001) and shorter hospitalization (4.2 vs. 7.3 days, P=0.001).
  • Operative times were similar between groups, with a 9% conversion rate in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic colostomy reversal is a safe and effective procedure for restoring intestinal continuity.
  • The laparoscopic approach offers significant advantages over open surgery, including decreased perioperative morbidity and faster patient recovery.