Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequential tapping interferes selectively with multiple-object tracking: do finger-tapping and tracking share a

Lana M Trick1, Jeannine Guindon, Lori A Vallis

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. ltrick@uoguelph.ca

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|June 14, 2006
PubMed
Summary

The human brain can only track a limited number of objects simultaneously. This study found that sequential finger tapping significantly interferes with object tracking, suggesting a shared limited resource.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple-object tracking in displays where each item is unique: Do competing organizations impair the ability to track targets that share a common colour or shape?

Vision research·2026
Same author

Multiple-Object Tracking and Visually Guided Touch: Dual-Task Interference Reveals Distinct Effects of Target Indexing and Target Report Method.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Multiple-object tracking and visually guided touch.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same author

Does the standard search task predict performance in related tasks for Kanizsa-style illusory contours?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2019
Same author

Why doesn't emotional valence affect subitising and counting in simple enumeration?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2019
Same author

Visual search does not always predict performance in tasks that require finding targets among distractors: The case of line-ending illusory contours.

Acta psychologica·2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Multiple-object tracking (MOT) is crucial for daily activities.
  • Young adults typically track 3-5 items, but the cognitive limits are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive limitations of multiple-object tracking.
  • To identify secondary tasks that interfere with tracking performance.

Main Methods:

  • Compared baseline tracking performance with performance during sequential tapping and sequential articulation tasks.
  • Used sequential articulation to control for general executive demands.

Main Results:

  • Sequential tapping significantly impaired multiple-object tracking performance compared to sequential articulation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This suggests a shared limited resource between tracking and sequential tapping.

    • Conclusions:

    • The limitation in multiple-object tracking may stem from shared cognitive resources.
    • Sequential tapping interferes with tracking more than general executive load.