Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Concept paper: a virtual centralized IRB system.

Rita McWilliams1, Carl W Hebden, Adele M K Gilpin

  • 1Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, ASB III, 3 Rutgers Plaza, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. mcwilliams@aesop.rutgers.edu

Accountability in Research
|June 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Procedures for the Comparative Testing of Noninvasive Neuroassessment Devices.

Journal of neurotrauma·2015
Same author

Statistical Issues in TBI Clinical Studies.

Frontiers in neurology·2013
Same author

Patient Characterization Protocols for Psychophysiological Studies of Traumatic Brain Injury and Post-TBI Psychiatric Disorders.

Frontiers in neurology·2013
Same author

Fatty, fatty, two-by-four: weight-teasing history and disturbed eating in young adult women.

American journal of public health·2013
Same author

Case-control study of disturbed eating behaviors and related psychographic characteristics in young adults with and without diet-related chronic health conditions.

Eating behaviors·2012
Same author

Communication patterns in a psychotherapy following traumatic brain injury: a quantitative case study based on symbolic dynamics.

BMC psychiatry·2011

A national virtual Institutional Review Board (IRB) system could provide expert review for complex research, ensuring consistent human subject protection and reducing local IRB burdens. This centralized approach leverages technology for efficient, specialized ethical oversight.

Area of Science:

  • Human Subjects Research
  • Bioethics
  • Research Administration

Background:

  • Increasing research complexity and volume strain local Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
  • Variability in local IRB reviews leads to inconsistent human subject protection.
  • Current systems struggle to accommodate specialized expertise needed for novel research designs and technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a national virtual Institutional Review Board (IRB) system for expert review.
  • To outline a model overseen by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual framework for a centralized, virtual IRB system.
  • Leveraging existing technology for remote IRB member participation.
  • Real-time online access to monitoring and adverse event reporting.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Centralized expert review ensures consistent human subject protection.
  • Reduces the substantial burden on local IRBs.
  • Potential to decrease research approval timelines.

Conclusions:

  • Complex research necessitates expert review panels.
  • A national virtual IRB offers specialized, consistent ethical oversight.
  • Technology enables expert IRB members to review remotely, improving efficiency and protection.