Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Genetic ties: are they morally binding?

Giuliana Fuscaldo1

  • 1Centre for the Study of Health and Society, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. g.fuscaldo@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au

Bioethics
|June 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public funding for mitochondrial donation: An Australian public deliberation.

BMC medical ethics·2025
Same author

'What am I going to do with those eggs': patients' experience of, and attitudes towards, surplus frozen eggs.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2025
Same author

Getting eggs 'out of the basket': facilitating decisions about surplus frozen eggs.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2025
Same author

Including Parents in Clinical Ethics Case Consultation.

Journal of paediatrics and child health·2025
Same author

Storage trends, usage and disposition outcomes following egg freezing.

Reproductive biomedicine online·2024
Same author

Financing future fertility: Women's views on funding egg freezing.

Reproductive biomedicine & society online·2021
Same journal

Transhumanism Without Transindividuation in the Age Without Epochality: Stiegler, Vice, and Radical Human Enhancement.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Between Safeguard and Constraint: Navigating Patient Autonomy in Protective Laws for Medical Assistance in Dying.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bioethics of Space Exploration: Life, Risk, and Responsibility Beyond Earth.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

The Concept of Harm in Medical Ethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

On the Destruction and Humanitarianisation of the Health System in Gaza and the Need for a Biopolitical Bioethics.

Bioethics·2026
Same journal

Shaping Future Children, Sex Selection, and "Normal" Human Capacities.

Bioethics·2026
See all related articles

Genetic relatedness alone does not determine parenthood or obligations. Moral responsibility, based on foreseeability and voluntary action, is key to parental duties, which can sometimes be transferred.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Reproductive Technologies
  • Philosophy of Law

Background:

  • Advances in reproductive technologies challenge traditional definitions of parenthood.
  • Genetic relatedness, gestation, and intention are debated as grounds for parental status.
  • Existing frameworks often assume causal implication in a child's creation as the basis for parenthood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the sufficiency of genetic relatedness as grounds for parenthood.
  • To propose an alternative account of parental obligations based on moral responsibility.
  • To explore the implications for third parties in reproductive technologies.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of concepts like moral responsibility, causality, freedom, and foreseeability.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachGenetics and ReproductionPhilosophical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of existing arguments on parenthood and reproductive technologies.
  • Development of a moral responsibility framework for parental obligations.

    • Main Results:

    • Argues that genetic relatedness is not sufficient for establishing parental obligations.
    • Proposes that parental responsibilities arise from the reasonably foreseeable consequence of voluntary actions leading to a child's birth.
    • Suggests that parental obligations, under certain conditions, can be justifiably transferred.

    Conclusions:

    • Parenthood and associated obligations are better understood through moral responsibility than mere genetic connection.
    • The framework of freedom and foreseeability offers a more robust basis for determining parental duties.
    • This perspective has significant implications for legal and ethical considerations in assisted reproduction.