Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:24

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive medical imaging technique based on a phenomenon of nuclear physics discovered in the 1930s, in which matter exposed to magnetic fields and radio waves was found to emit radio signals. In 1970, a physician and researcher named Raymond Damadian noticed that malignant (cancerous) tissue gave off different signals than normal body tissue. He applied for a patent for the first MRI scanning device in clinical use by the early 1980s. The early MRI...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Machine Learning Model Using Pre-Cancer Therapy Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Images to Predict Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction.

JACC. Cardiovascular imaging·2026
Same author

Association between posterior cerebral artery involvement and arterial wall enhancement in moyamoya disease: a cross-sectional study with vessel wall imaging.

Neuroradiology·2026
Same author

3D Brachial Plexus Neurography With Variable-Rate Selective Excitation RF Pulses.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Integrated Deep Learning-Based Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging with DANTE Preparation: Feasibility and Technical Performance.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Optimizing knee MRI: 3D proton density turbo spin echo nDixon sequence vs. 2D high-resolution turbo spin echo in half the acquisition time.

European journal of radiology·2025
Same author

Total tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis of whole-body DWI-MRI for prognostic stratification in patients with R-ISS stage II multiple myeloma.

Magnetic resonance imaging·2025
Same journal

Vessel Wall Imaging in 1.5 T MRI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Interchangeability With Standard 3 T MRI.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Accelerated Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstruction for 3D T2 Dark-Fluid in Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

3D Freehand Ultrasound Imaging of Optic Nerve Sheath.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Iodinated Contrast Media Hypersensitivity in 115,966 Patients: Risk Factors, Severity Profiles, and the Impact of Iodine Concentration on Reaction Risk.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Improvement of Lung Nodule Volumetric Accuracy with Photon-counting Computed Tomography Over Energy-integrating Computed Tomography in Low-dose Screening: A Phantom Study.

Investigative radiology·2026
Same journal

Photon-counting CT in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Improved Metal Artifact Reduction and Impact on Bone Fusion Assessment.

Investigative radiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
17:16

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

Brain magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla using BLADE compared with standard rectilinear data sampling.

Bernd J Wintersperger1, Val M Runge, Jonmenjoy Biswas

  • 1Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospitals-Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. Bernd.Wintersperger@med.uni-muenchen.de

Investigative Radiology
|June 15, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER; BLADE) MRI significantly reduces motion and other artifacts in 3 T brain imaging, especially for axial T2-weighted FLAIR sequences. This technique offers improved image quality compared to standard k-space sampling.

More Related Videos

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
10:06

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain

Published on: May 10, 2012

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
17:16

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain
10:06

High-resolution Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods for Human Midbrain

Published on: May 10, 2012

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Standard k-space sampling in MRI can be prone to various imaging artifacts.
  • Artifacts can degrade image quality and potentially impact diagnostic accuracy.
  • The PROPELLER (BLADE) technique is an advanced acquisition method designed to mitigate artifacts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER; BLADE) technique against standard k-space sampling for brain MRI at 3 Tesla.
  • To evaluate the reduction of specific imaging artifacts, such as motion and pulsation artifacts, in both axial and sagittal orientations.
  • To assess the overall image quality and diagnostic utility of PROPELLER (BLADE) compared to conventional methods.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 40 consenting patients was conducted at 3 T.
  • Standard and PROPELLER (BLADE) techniques were compared for axial T2-weighted FLAIR and sagittal T1-weighted gradient echo sequences.
  • Imaging protocols were matched for spatial resolution, and data were evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists for artifacts and overall quality.

Main Results:

  • PROPELLER (BLADE) axial T2-weighted FLAIR demonstrated significantly fewer pulsation and Gibb's artifacts than standard scans.
  • Ghosting (motion) artifacts were substantially lower in PROPELLER T2-weighted data, with readers rating it superior or equal in 95% of cases (kappa = 1).
  • Sagittal T1-weighted PROPELLER FLAIR exhibited consistent wrap artifacts, with only fair reader agreement (kappa = 0.24).

Conclusions:

  • PROPELLER (BLADE) is a viable technique for 3 T brain MRI, effectively minimizing motion artifacts.
  • The PROPELLER acquisition scheme successfully reduces various artifacts that compromise scan quality.
  • While highly effective for axial T2-weighted imaging, further optimization may be needed for sagittal T1-weighted sequences to address wrap-around artifacts.