Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Parallel response selection in dual-task situations.

Scott Watter1, Gordon D Logan

  • 1Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. watter@mcmaster.ca

Perception & Psychophysics
|June 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imagine No Resources: Attention Is Selection and Normalization for Choice.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2026
Same author

Separating decision and motor contributions to behavioral biases induced by manipulating stimulus probability.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Order is ordinal in serial memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

It was 40 years ago today: Reflections "On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method" by Logan et al. (1984).

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025
Same author

The power of many: The role of global matching in the episodic flanker compatibility effect.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Dual-task performance shows faster reaction times when response fingers match across tasks. This suggests response information for Task 2 may be generated before Task 1 selection, challenging current bottleneck theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual-task performance is often explained by a central processing bottleneck.
  • The response-selection bottleneck (RSB) theory posits discrete stages of processing.
  • Understanding the limits of simultaneous information processing is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate semantic and response priming in a dual-task setting.
  • To examine the implications of priming effects on existing dual-task theories.
  • To test the discrete-stage processing assumption of the response-selection bottleneck theory.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments employed a dual-task procedure.
  • Reaction times were measured for sequential stimuli.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Semantic and response priming effects were analyzed based on task demands.

    • Main Results:

    • Reaction times were significantly faster when the response finger for Task 1 and Task 2 stimuli was identical.
    • This response priming indicates that response information for the second task can be prepared earlier than predicted by strict bottleneck models.
    • Findings suggest potential overlap in processing stages, challenging discrete-stage assumptions.

    Conclusions:

    • The observed response priming challenges the traditional response-selection bottleneck theory.
    • Data suggest that response information generation may not be strictly confined to a discrete stage.
    • RSB theory may require modification to accommodate these findings while retaining its core bottleneck concept.