Is mandatory outpatient treatment effective?

This paper reviews the major studies of mandatory outpatient treatment (MOT) and examines why there has been inconsistency in some of the findings. Attempts to answer the question "is mandatory treatment effective?" must first clarify the type of mandatory treatment being examined, the type of patient being treated, and the outcome by which effectiveness is measured. There is consistent evidence that various forms of MOT increase follow-up with psychiatric services and that court-ordered outpatient committal decreases victimization of patients in the community. It also appears likely that MOT reduces the use of hospitalization; but, due to methodological problems associated with the research, this conclusion remains controversial.