Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Ultrasound Cyclo Plasty in Eyes with Glaucoma
Published on: January 26, 2018
[Intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. A comparison between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry]
1Abteilung für Augenheilkunde, Klinikum Nord-Heidberg, Tangstedter Landstrasse 400, 22417 Hamburg. augen-klinikum-nord@gmx.de
Objective:
Corneal thickness and deformation seem to have a considerable influence on intraocular pressure measurement. Due to differences in the corneal deformation in either non-contact tonometry or applanation tonometry, both methods should be compared in the same patient group depending on central corneal thickness.
Methods:
In 106 eyes of 55 patients (18 males, 37 females, age 17-89 years, mean 63.3 years) with glaucoma and central corneal thickness between 409 and 644 microm (Orbscan II pachymetry) intraocular pressure was measured in each eye with non-contact tonometry (Reichert AT550) and 30 min later with Goldman applanation tonometry.
Result:
Non-contact tonometry as well as applanation tonometry showed a positive correlation between measured intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. The steepness of the line of regression was 0.33 mmHg per 10 microm of corneal thickness in non-contact tonometry and 0.17 mmHg per 10 microm of corneal thickness in applanation tonometry.
Conclusion:
Independently of the large differences in individual pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry, we found higher IOP values with non-contact tonometry in thicker corneas as compared with applanation tonometry. In thinner corneas there was a better correspondence between both methods. Thus, it seems very likely that corneal rigidity increases with corneal thickness.
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
