Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Postscript: health disparity and collaborative care.

John H Wasson1, Regina Benjamin

  • 1Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. john.h.wasson@dartmouth.edu

The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management
|June 22, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A "What Matters Index" (WMI) for Adolescents.

The Journal of ambulatory care management·2023
Same author

Aligning Payments, Services, and Quality in Primary Care.

JAMA·2021
Same author

Practice Standards for Effective Telemedicine in Chronic Care Management After COVID-19.

The Journal of ambulatory care management·2020
Same author

A National Pre-Pandemic Survey of Patient-Reported Health Confidence and Implications for Post-Pandemic Practice.

The Journal of ambulatory care management·2020
Same author

Standardized assessment, information, and networking technologies (SAINTs): lessons from three decades of development and testing.

Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation·2020
Same author

Comment on "Connected Access".

The Journal of ambulatory care management·2019

Patients with lower income reported worse healthcare experiences and less effective disease management. Financial status significantly impacts health outcomes, indicating that technology alone cannot solve health disparities.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Sociology of Health

Background:

  • Financial status is a key social determinant of health.
  • Disparities in healthcare access and quality persist.
  • Understanding patient experiences across financial strata is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare healthcare processes between patients with low and adequate financial status.
  • To identify specific areas where financial status influences patient-reported outcomes.
  • To assess the impact of financial status on perceived quality of care and disease management.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of patient-reported data.
  • Statistical adjustment for age, gender, illness burden, and health behaviors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Large sample sizes for both low (n=7467) and adequate (n=43,701) financial status groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Patients with low financial status reported 10-30% less good service and collaborative care.
    • Disease management and prevention markers were 7-18% lower for patients with inadequate income.
    • Financial status demonstrated a broad, adverse influence on patient-reported healthcare.

    Conclusions:

    • Inadequate financial status negatively impacts multiple facets of healthcare experience.
    • Patient-centered technology alone is insufficient to eliminate health disparities.
    • Addressing financial barriers is essential for achieving equitable healthcare outcomes.