Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Use of Ultra-high Field MRI in Small Rodent Models of Polycystic Kidney Disease for In Vivo Phenotyping and Drug Monitoring
Published on: June 23, 2015
Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: implication for the care of CKD patients
J-C Souberbielle1, A Boutten, M-C Carlier
1Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France. jean-claude.souberbielle@nck.ap-hop-paris.fr
Different laboratory assays show significant variability in measuring intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This can lead to inconsistent treatment decisions based on the specific PTH assay used.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Nephrology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQI) guidelines suggest target serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels for chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients.
- These guidelines were established using the Allegro intact PTH assay, necessitating an evaluation of their applicability to other commercially available assays.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the comparability of 15 different commercial immunoassays for intact PTH measurement against the Allegro intact PTH assay.
- To determine the impact of inter-assay variability on achieving recommended PTH target ranges in CKD patients.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of PTH concentrations from 47 serum pools from dialysis patients using 15 commercial immunoassays against the Allegro intact PTH assay as a reference.
- Evaluation of the recovery of synthetic 1-84 and 7-84 PTH added to serum pools to assess assay specificity and cross-reactivity.
Main Results:
- While assays showed high correlation, significant differences in PTH concentrations were observed, with median biases ranging from -44.9% to 123.0% compared to the Allegro assay.
- PTH levels of 150-300 ng/l on the Allegro assay translated to a wide range (83-323 ng/l and 160-638 ng/l, respectively) on other assays.
- Inter-method variability was attributed to differences in antibody specificity and standardization, affecting the recognition of different PTH fragments (e.g., 7-84 PTH) and recovery of 1-84 PTH.
Conclusions:
- There is substantial inter-method variability in intact PTH measurements across different commercial immunoassays.
- This variability can lead to discordant therapeutic decisions for CKD patients depending on the assay used.
- The study recommends implementing assay-specific decision limits or correcting factors for PTH results in CKD management.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Dosage Regimen: Individualization