Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

EEG and MEG brain-computer interface for tetraplegic patients.

Laura Kauhanen1, Tommi Nykopp, Janne Lehtonen

  • 1Laboratory of Computational Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, FIN-02015 Espoo, Finland. laura.kauhanen@tkk.fi

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering : a Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
|June 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erratum: Embodied emotions in ancient Neo-Assyrian texts revealed by bodily mapping of emotional semantics.

iScience·2026
Same author

Cerebral topographies of perceived and felt emotions.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Embodied emotions in ancient Neo-Assyrian texts revealed by bodily mapping of emotional semantics.

iScience·2025
Same author

Diversity in Naturally Acquired Immunity to Group B Streptococcus: A Comparative Study of Women From Bangladesh, Malawi, and the United Kingdom.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2024
Same author

Six types of loves differentially recruit reward and social cognition brain areas.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2024
Same author

Sisterhood predicts similar neural processing of a film.

NeuroImage·2024

This study found that dynamic classifiers achieved high accuracy (75-91%) in decoding attempted finger movements from magnetoencephalographic (MEG) and electroencephalographic (EEG) signals in tetraplegics, with no difference between MEG and EEG.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Technology

Background:

  • Motor cortex activity in individuals with spinal cord injuries is crucial for developing assistive technologies.
  • Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) are non-invasive techniques to measure brain activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize sensorimotor cortex signals during attempted index finger movements in tetraplegics.
  • To compare the efficacy of different classifiers for decoding these brain signals.
  • To evaluate the performance of MEG and EEG in this context.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded MEG and EEG signals from three tetraplegic participants attempting index finger movements.
  • Classified single MEG and EEG trials using batch-trained and dynamic classifiers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed signal features within the 0.5-3.0 Hz frequency band.

    • Main Results:

    • Dynamic classifiers achieved higher classification accuracies (75%, 89%, 91%) compared to batch-trained classifiers.
    • Optimal performance was observed using features in the 0.5-3.0 Hz frequency band.
    • No significant difference in classification accuracy was found between MEG and EEG signals.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic classification of sensorimotor cortex activity is effective for decoding attempted movements in tetraplegia.
    • MEG and EEG offer comparable performance for this application.
    • Findings support the potential use of these brain-computer interfaces for assistive devices.