Hospitalization for pelvic inflammatory disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Kenneth J Smith1, Roberta B Ness, Mark S Roberts

  • 1Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. smithkj2@upmc.edu

Insights

Hospitalizing young women for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is generally not cost-effective. Even with improved complication rates, the expense per quality-adjusted life-year gained often remains high.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Health Economics
  • Clinical Decision Modeling

Background:

  • Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) frequently leads to hospitalization in nulliparous women.
  • Adolescents and young women are particularly susceptible to PID and its complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the economic feasibility of inpatient treatment for PID in adolescents and young women.
  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of hospitalization versus outpatient care for mild to moderate PID.

Main Methods:

  • A Markov decision model was employed to analyze costs and outcomes.
  • Cost-effectiveness was calculated as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
  • The model incorporated varying assumptions on hospitalization's impact on PID complications and chronic pelvic pain.

Main Results:

  • Hospitalization costs per QALY gained were $145,000, $67,400, and $42,400 if complications decreased by 10%, 20%, or 30%, respectively.
  • The analysis was highly sensitive to assumptions regarding chronic pelvic pain development.
  • Costs per QALY increased significantly if hospitalization did not mitigate chronic pain.

Conclusions:

  • Hospitalization for PID in young women is unlikely to be economically justifiable for fertility preservation.
  • Even substantial reductions in PID complications do not typically render hospitalization cost-effective.
  • Outpatient management may be a more economically sound approach for mild to moderate PID.
Abstract