Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Statistical validation of two sample comparison methods for oligonucleotide microarray in rat ischemia model.

Megumi Sugahara Kobayashi1, Yasuo Takahashi, Toshihito Nagata

  • 1Division of Genomic Epidemiology and Clinical Trials, Advanced Medical Research Center, Nihon University School of Medicine, Oyaguchi-Kami Machi, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan.

Neurochemical Research
|June 24, 2006
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Endometriosis in the cecum diagnosed via forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with a 19G fine-needle biopsy needle: a case report.

Clinical journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Proactive adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the operations of Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA): Current initiatives, governance, and future perspectives.

Global health & medicine·2026
Same author

Video-Based Analysis of Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Pancreatic Guidewire-Assisted Biliary Cannulation.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2026
Same author

EUS-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy With a Right-to-Left Hepatic Duct Bridging Stent for Refractory Mucin Plug Cholangitis Caused by an Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Related Pancreatobiliary Fistula.

Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society·2026
Same author

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Using a Forward-Viewing Echoendoscope and Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent in a Patient With Acute Cholecystitis After Gastrectomy With Billroth II Reconstruction.

Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society·2026
Same author

Drug-Induced Liver Injury with Eosinophilia: A Case-Control Study Using Electronic Medical Records.

Biological & pharmaceutical bulletin·2026

Comparing gene expression analysis methods in a rat ischemia model revealed significant differences. Pair-wise comparison offers stricter screening for reliable gene expression data, while sample average comparison requires additional statistical validation.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • High-density oligonucleotide arrays are crucial for gene expression analysis.
  • Understanding gene expression changes in models like rat ischemia is vital for biological research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the statistical reliability of two gene expression screening methods: pair-wise comparison and sample average comparison.
  • To assess the impact of different fold-change thresholds on the reliability of screened gene expression data.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a rat ischemia model for gene expression analysis.
  • Employed high-density oligonucleotide arrays for data acquisition.
  • Applied statistical methods to analyze two comparison approaches: pair-wise and sample average comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluated screening reliability across fold-change thresholds from 1.2 to 10.

    • Main Results:

    • Pair-wise comparison maintained over 95% significant elements at a 2.5-fold threshold, demonstrating robust screening.
    • Pair-wise comparison's strictness led to the exclusion of some significantly altered genes.
    • Sample average comparison yielded elements with a lower probability of significance, necessitating further statistical analysis.
    • Significant differences in the number and reliability of screened elements were observed between the two comparison methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Pair-wise comparison provides a more reliable method for screening significantly altered genes in oligonucleotide array analysis.
    • Sample average comparison requires supplementary statistical validation to ensure the reliability of identified gene expression changes.
    • The choice of comparison method significantly impacts the outcome and interpretation of gene expression studies.