Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026
08:05
A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
Generalization of punishment effects-a case study
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|October 1, 1968
Summary
Electric shock punishment effectively reduced undesirable behaviors in an adolescent with intellectual disability. However, the effects were highly specific, and full therapeutic goals were not met, highlighting limitations of this intervention.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Applied Behavior Analysis
- Developmental Disabilities
Background:
- Infrequent and unpredictable biting and destructive behaviors present significant challenges in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
- Electric shock punishment has been explored as an intervention to modify severe problem behaviors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of response-contingent electric shock in eliminating specific undesirable behaviors in an adolescent with an intellectual disability.
- To identify the limitations and potential challenges associated with using electric shock as a punishment procedure in a therapeutic setting.
Main Methods:
- Response-contingent electric shock was administered in both laboratory and criterion situations.
- The intervention targeted infrequent and unpredictable biting and destructive acts.
Main Results:
- Initial application of electric shock produced dramatic reductions in the targeted behaviors.
- The effects of the electric shock were highly discriminated, meaning the behavior was suppressed only in the presence of the punishment contingency.
- The overall therapeutic objectives were not fully accomplished due to the limited generalization of the shock's effects.
Conclusions:
- Electric shock punishment demonstrates significant power in suppressing specific behaviors.
- The highly discriminated nature of the effects highlights a key limitation, potentially hindering the achievement of broader therapeutic goals.
- Findings emphasize the need for careful planning and consideration of potential challenges when implementing shock punishment programs.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Generalization, Discrimination, and Extinction
Generalization, discrimination, and extinction are key concepts in operant conditioning that influence how behaviors are learned and maintained.
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
Generalization occurs when a behavior reinforced in one context is performed in similar situations. For instance, a student who studies diligently for calculus and receives excellent grades might apply the same study habits to psychology and history, expecting similar results. Generalization shows how learning in one setting can influence behavior in...
01:27Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
01:22Case Studies
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
01:06Law of Effect
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
01:21Behavior Modification
Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
01:28Behaviorism
The field of behaviorism was pioneered by figures such as Ivan Pavlov, John B. Watson, and B.F. Skinner fundamentally shifted the focus of psychology to the observable and controllable aspects of human and animal behavior. This shift marked a critical evolution in the discipline, emphasizing scientific rigor and experimental methodology.
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...