Related Experiment Videos
Systematic reinforcement: academic performance of underachieving students.
1Washington State University.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|January 1, 1971
Summary
Combining tangible and social reinforcement significantly boosted academic performance in underachieving students. Social reinforcement alone maintained high output and accuracy, though work time returned to baseline levels.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Underachieving students often require targeted interventions to improve academic performance.
- The efficacy of different reinforcement strategies in educational settings needs continuous investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of contingent tangible and social reinforcement on academic performance.
- To determine if social reinforcement alone could sustain the gains achieved with combined reinforcement.
Main Methods:
- An experimental classroom study involving 25 underachieving students.
- Implemented a baseline period followed by two treatment periods: Treatment I (tangible and social reinforcement) and Treatment II (social reinforcement only).
- Measured academic performance through percentage of time at work, work output per minute, and accuracy.
Main Results:
- Combined tangible and social reinforcement led to substantial increases in students' work time, output rate, and accuracy.
- Following the removal of tangible reinforcers, students maintained high output rates and accuracy.
- Work time reverted to baseline levels after tangible reinforcers were withdrawn.
Conclusions:
- Contingent tangible and social reinforcement effectively enhances academic performance in underachieving students.
- Social reinforcement alone can maintain improvements in output rate and accuracy, suggesting its long-term value.
- The study highlights the differential effects of tangible versus social reinforcement on student engagement and productivity.