Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Engineering the behavioral engineer.

R Loeber1

  • 1Kingston Psychiatric Hospital, Kingston, Ontario.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|January 1, 1971
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A promise of reward improved nursing staff accuracy in treating a simulated headbanging patient. Patient improvement did not enhance treatment accuracy, suggesting motivational factors are key for effective behavioral interventions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Substance use and its relationship to conduct problems and delinquency in young boys.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

Childhood predictors of desistance and level of persistence in offending in early onset offenders.

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2009
Same author

Cohort differences in the progression of developmental pathways: evidence for period effects on secular trends of violence in males.

Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention·2008
Same author

Male mental health problems, psychopathy, and personality traits: key findings from the first 14 years of the Pittsburgh Youth Study.

Clinical child and family psychology review·2002
Same author

Maltreatment of boys and the development of disruptive and delinquent behavior.

Development and psychopathology·2002
Same author

What predicts adolescent violence in better-off neighborhoods?

Journal of abnormal child psychology·2001
Same journal

Latency and persistence of renewal in an intensive outpatient clinic.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

The effect of varied versus constant high-probability instructional sequences on cooperation.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Relations between heart rate and precursors: A replication and extension of prior research.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Integrating five linear trend techniques into performance-criteria-based effect size measurements: Impressions and recommendations.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional analysis and treatment of higher level restricted repetitive behavior displayed by individuals with autism.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
Same journal

Contingency drives children's vocal behavior.

Journal of applied behavior analysis·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Nursing Practice
  • Operant Conditioning

Background:

  • Headbanging behavior can be challenging to manage in clinical settings.
  • Operant methods are established techniques for modifying patient behavior.
  • Understanding factors influencing treatment accuracy is crucial for effective nursing care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of promised rewards on nursing staff's accuracy when treating simulated headbanging.
  • To determine if observed patient improvement affects treatment accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-eight nursing staff members participated in the study.
  • Participants were randomly assigned to four conditions: patient improvement/non-improvement and reward promise/no reward promise.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Operant methods were used to treat a simulated headbanging patient.

    • Main Results:

    • A promise of reward significantly increased the accuracy of the nursing staff's treatment.
    • Observed improvement in the simulated patient's condition did not lead to improved treatment accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Motivational incentives, such as promised rewards, can enhance the effectiveness of nursing interventions.
    • Focusing solely on patient progress may not be sufficient to optimize treatment delivery; staff motivation is a critical component.