Related Experiment Videos
The effects of feedback and consequences on transitional cursive letter formation.
J J Trap1, P Milner-Davis, S Joseph
1The Ohio State University.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
|October 1, 1978
Summary
This study found that verbal and visual feedback, with or without immediate rewriting, improved cursive letter stroke accuracy in first graders. Potential reinforcement also boosted performance on trained letters.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Motor Skill Acquisition
Background:
- Cursive handwriting is a fundamental skill taught in early education.
- Effective feedback methods are crucial for mastering complex motor skills like handwriting.
- Understanding how different interventions impact learning is key for pedagogical development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of verbal and visual feedback on cursive letter stroke formation.
- To assess the efficacy of immediate rewriting in conjunction with feedback for improving handwriting.
- To examine the role of potential reinforcement in enhancing cursive letter writing skills.
Main Methods:
- Twelve first-grade students participated in the study.
- Interventions included verbal and visual feedback, feedback with immediate rewriting, and potential reinforcement.
- Students practiced both trained and untrained cursive letters, with interventions applied only to trained letters.
Main Results:
- All conditions led to an increase in the percentage of correct trained letter strokes.
- Performance on practiced but untrained letters showed a similar trend to trained letters.
- No consistent generalization of learning was observed for untrained and unpracticed letters.
Conclusions:
- Verbal and visual feedback, especially when combined with immediate rewriting, is effective for improving cursive letter stroke accuracy.
- Reinforcement positively impacts the learning of trained cursive letters.
- Further research is needed to understand generalization effects in handwriting acquisition.