Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
Published on: October 13, 2018
Saying and doing: A contingency-space analysis
B A Matthews1, E Shimoff, A C Catania
1University of Maryland Baltimore County.
Abstract:
Correspondences between verbal responding (saying) and nonverbal responding (doing) may be organized in terms of the classes of verbal/nonverbal relations into which particular instances of verbal/nonverbal response sequences can enter. Contingency spaces, which display relations among events in terms of the probability of one event given or not given another, have been useful in analyses of nonverbal behavior. We derive a taxonomy of verbal/nonverbal behavior relations from a contingency space that takes into account two conditional probabilities: the probability of a nonverbal response given a verbal response and that probability given the absence of the verbal response. For example, positive correspondence may be said to exist as a response class when the probability of doing is high given saying but is otherwise low. Criteria for other generalized classes, including negative correspondence, follow from this analysis.
Related Concept Videos
Contingency Table
Determination of Expected Frequency
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Manipulation and Analysis
Real-World Applications of Space Curves

