[Interventional treatment of extracranial carotid stenoses: current status, requirements and indications]
H Mudra1, W Büchele, K Mathias
12 Medizinische Abteilung (Schwerpunkte Kardiologie, Pulmunologie und internistische Intensivmedizin) Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, Klinikum Neuperlach. h.mudra@kh-neuperlach.de
Insights
Percutaneous treatment for carotid artery stenosis shows stroke and death rates comparable to surgery. This consensus paper provides recommendations for carotid angioplasty and stenting indications and performance.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Neurology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Context:
- Extracranial carotid artery obstructions cause approximately 30,000 strokes annually in Germany.
- Surgical endarterectomy is a proven treatment, but percutaneous interventions are increasingly utilized.
Purpose:
- To summarize the current scientific evidence on carotid angioplasty and stenting.
- To provide recommendations for the performance and indications of endovascular treatment for carotid stenosis.
Summary:
- A review of randomized trials (CAVATAS, SAPPHIRE) and large registries (≥500 patients) indicates no significant difference in 30-day stroke and death rates between angioplasty/stenting and surgery.
- The periprocedural complication rate for endovascular treatment is comparable to that of surgical intervention.
- Recommendations are based on patient symptoms, surgical risk, and stenosis severity, with evidence levels ranging from B to C.
Impact:
- Highlights the comparable safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment versus surgery for carotid stenosis.
- Emphasizes the need for systematic quality monitoring and interdisciplinary collaboration, particularly with neurologists.
- Informs clinical decision-making regarding the optimal treatment strategy for patients with extracranial carotid stenosis.
Abstract:
Interventional treatment of extracranial carotid stenoses: current status, requirements and indications Around 30000 strokes per year in Germany are caused by extracranial obstructions of the carotid arteries. Besides the well established surgical endatherectomy, which has been proven to be superior to medical treatment alone in randomized multicenter trials, percutaneous treatment by balloon angioplasty and stent placement is increasingly performed. This consensus paper summarizes the present status of scientific studies and controlled treatment registries of carotid angioplasty and stenting and yields to recommendations regarding its performance and indication. A Medline search was done until August 2005 including all randomized comparative studies with clinical endpoints and all controlled registries with more than 500 patients included. Both completed randomized trials comparing angioplasty and stenting with surgery (CAVATAS and SAPPHIRE) did not show a significant difference with respect to stroke and death within 30 days. The incidence of this combined endpoint was between 3.3 and 6.9% in large multicenter registries. Thus, the current endovascular treatment results in a perlinterventional complication rate comparable to that which is commonly accepted for vascular surgery. A systematic preferably external quality monitoring as well as interdisciplinary cooperation most importantly with neurologists is recomendedfor all interventionalists. Based on available clinical data, this consensus paper defines recommendation classes I or II with a level of evidence B or C depending on symptoms, operative risk status of the patient and severity of the underlying stenosis.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
