Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

05:42
Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement
Published on: September 13, 2022
Three-dimensional accuracy of implant placement in a computer-assisted navigation system
Wai-Kuen Chiu1, Wai-Kuen Luk, Lim-Kwong Cheung
1Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong. chiuwk1@hkusua.hku.hk
Summary
Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) systems show good accuracy for dental implant drilling, with entry point and angulation deviations under 1 mm and 4 degrees. However, 30% of drillings perforated the mandibular canal, highlighting the need for safety margins in planning.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Surgical Navigation Systems
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Accurate placement of dental implants is crucial for successful outcomes.
- Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) systems offer potential for enhanced precision in implant surgery.
- Evaluating the 3-dimensional accuracy of CAN systems in simulated surgical environments is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the 3-dimensional accuracy of dental implant drilling using a computer-assisted navigation (CAN) system.
- To evaluate the precision of entry point localization, drill path angulation, and drilling depth in simulated mandible models.
Main Methods:
- Eight acrylic resin mandible models with simulated mandibular canals (MC) were used.
- Computerized tomography (CT) scans were performed for 3D planning.
- Drill holes were created using the CAN system and assessed for accuracy by sectioning the models.
Main Results:
- Mean deviation for entry point localization was 0.43 mm, and for angulation was 4.0 degrees.
- 65% of drill holes were within 1 mm of the planned superior border of the MC.
- 30% of drill holes perforated the MC, with a mean perforation depth of 0.37 mm.
Conclusions:
- The CAN system demonstrated acceptable accuracy for entry point and angulation in dental implant drilling.
- A significant percentage of perforations into the MC occurred, emphasizing the need for cautious planning.
- A safety margin of at least 1.1 mm above the MC superior border is recommended during the planning phase.
