Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.

Joshua B Tenenbaum¹, Thomas L Griffiths, Charles Kemp

¹Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. jtb@mit.edu

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

|June 27, 2006

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A folk taxonomy of magic.

Cognition·2026

Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026

Same author

Resolving Feynman's restaurant problem reveals optimal solutions and human strategies.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Considering Psychological Mechanisms Can Change the Interpretation of Bayesian Models.

Topics in cognitive science·2026

Same author

Conniving With Continuations: Representing Goals in a Domain-Specific Language of Thought.

Topics in cognitive science·2026

Same author

Neural representation of action symbols in primate frontal cortex.

Nature·2026

Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

See all related articles

Human inductive inference relies on both statistical learning and structured knowledge. Our theory-based Bayesian framework models this by treating learning and reasoning as statistical inferences over knowledge structures.

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Psychology
Artificial Intelligence

Background:

Inductive inference enables humans to generalize from limited data for learning word meanings, properties, and causal relationships.
Existing theories of induction focus on either statistical learning or domain-specific knowledge constraints (theories/schemas).

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a unified framework for understanding inductive learning and reasoning.
To model how both statistical learning and structured knowledge contribute to human generalization.

Main Methods:

Development of a theory-based Bayesian framework.
Modeling inductive learning and reasoning as statistical inferences.
Utilizing structured knowledge representations within the Bayesian model.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Demonstrates the necessity of integrating statistical learning with structured knowledge for effective induction.
Provides a computational model for human inductive generalization.
Highlights the role of structured knowledge in overcoming data sparsity.

Conclusions:

Both statistical learning and structured domain knowledge are crucial for human inductive inference.
A theory-based Bayesian approach offers a powerful framework for modeling human knowledge acquisition and use.
This framework advances our understanding of generalization from sparse data.