Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
A comparison of alternative strategies for cost-effective water quality management in lakes
Daniel Boyd Kramer1, Stephen Polasky, Anthony Starfield
1James Madison College and the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, Case Hall, East Lansing, 48825-1205, USA. dbk@msu.edu
Abstract:
Roughly 45% of the assessed lakes in the United States are impaired for one or more reasons. Eutrophication due to excess phosphorus loading is common in many impaired lakes. Various strategies are available to lake residents for addressing declining lake water quality, including septic system upgrades and establishing riparian buffers. This study examines 25 lakes to determine whether septic upgrades or riparian buffers are a more cost-effective strategy to meet a phosphorus reduction target. We find that riparian buffers are the more cost-effective strategy in every case but one. Large transaction costs associated with the negotiation and monitoring of riparian buffers, however, may be prohibiting lake residents from implementing the most cost-effective strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Net Change Theorem
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss
Methods of Medium Optimization

