Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Telling the truth about genomics.

Ruth Chadwick1

  • 1ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics, Furness College, Lancaster University, UK. R.Chadwick@lancaster.ac.uk

Communication & Medicine
|July 1, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Little Things Mean A Lot.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

The Ecological Genome Project and the Promises of Ecogenomics for Society: Realising a Shared Vision as One Health.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

Emerging and evolving values in the changing landscape of genomics.

Frontiers in genetics·2025
Same author

Health care and the ethical implications of treatment spaces.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

Commercialization and the Olympics: A step too far?

Bioethics·2024
Same author

The Human Genome Organisation (HUGO) and a vision for Ecogenomics: the Ecological Genome Project.

Human genomics·2023
Same journal

Toward an interactional approach to health literacy.

Communication & medicine·2026
Same journal

Communication and intercultural barriers in Swiss health care involving Spanish-Galician migrants: An exploratory study.

Communication & medicine·2026
Same journal

Narrative in bits and pieces: Moving between monologue and dialogue in the non-literary journal of a writer with dementia.

Communication & medicine·2026
Same journal

Medical humanities: An alliance or an aberration?

Communication & medicine·2026
Same journal

Making sense of sense-making: The challenge of navigating interactional competence in dementia care.

Communication & medicine·2026
Same journal

Anatomy of a conversation: Voices of dual-role medical interpreters.

Communication & medicine·2026
See all related articles

Genomics communication extends beyond clinics, prompting public engagement. Science alone cannot answer philosophical questions about knowledge, ethics, or hope, suggesting a need for broader dialogue.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science

Background:

  • Communication in genomics has expanded from clinical settings to public discourse.
  • Scientists are increasingly called upon for public engagement regarding genomics.
  • Genomics intersects with fundamental philosophical questions concerning knowledge, ethics, and hope.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the role of public engagement in addressing philosophical questions raised by genomics.
  • To examine the limitations of science in answering questions of 'what ought to be done' and 'what may be hoped for'.
  • To propose that public engagement has a significant, often unrecognized, role in the 'hope' dimension of genomics.

Main Methods:

  • Philosophical analysis of Kantian questions in the context of genomics.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of ethical considerations in scientific communication and public engagement.
  • Argumentative exploration of the relationship between scientific knowledge, ethical decision-making, and existential hope.

    • Main Results:

    • Genomics provides partial answers to 'what can be known' but cannot definitively answer 'what ought to be done' or 'what may be hoped for'.
    • Science faces criticism for potentially narrowing options while claiming neutrality.
    • Public engagement is crucial for exploring the 'hope' aspect, which is linked to the meaning of human life.

    Conclusions:

    • Public engagement in genomics should extend beyond scientific information dissemination to address deeper philosophical and existential questions.
    • Science can benefit from adopting a 'service ideal' to better navigate ethical and societal implications.
    • Addressing the 'hope' question through public dialogue is vital for understanding the broader impact of genomics on human life.